Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/5] blk-mq: Facilitate a shared tags per tagset
To:     John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, axboe@kernel.dk,
        jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc:     linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, ming.lei@redhat.com, hare@suse.com,
        bvanassche@acm.org, chenxiang66@hisilicon.com
References: <1573652209-163505-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
 <1573652209-163505-4-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
From:   Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=hare@suse.de; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=
 mQINBE6KyREBEACwRN6XKClPtxPiABx5GW+Yr1snfhjzExxkTYaINHsWHlsLg13kiemsS6o7
 qrc+XP8FmhcnCOts9e2jxZxtmpB652lxRB9jZE40mcSLvYLM7S6aH0WXKn8bOqpqOGJiY2bc
 6qz6rJuqkOx3YNuUgiAxjuoYauEl8dg4bzex3KGkGRuxzRlC8APjHlwmsr+ETxOLBfUoRNuE
 b4nUtaseMPkNDwM4L9+n9cxpGbdwX0XwKFhlQMbG3rWA3YqQYWj1erKIPpgpfM64hwsdk9zZ
 QO1krgfULH4poPQFpl2+yVeEMXtsSou915jn/51rBelXeLq+cjuK5+B/JZUXPnNDoxOG3j3V
 VSZxkxLJ8RO1YamqZZbVP6jhDQ/bLcAI3EfjVbxhw9KWrh8MxTcmyJPn3QMMEp3wpVX9nSOQ
 tzG72Up/Py67VQe0x8fqmu7R4MmddSbyqgHrab/Nu+ak6g2RRn3QHXAQ7PQUq55BDtj85hd9
 W2iBiROhkZ/R+Q14cJkWhzaThN1sZ1zsfBNW0Im8OVn/J8bQUaS0a/NhpXJWv6J1ttkX3S0c
 QUratRfX4D1viAwNgoS0Joq7xIQD+CfJTax7pPn9rT////hSqJYUoMXkEz5IcO+hptCH1HF3
 qz77aA5njEBQrDRlslUBkCZ5P+QvZgJDy0C3xRGdg6ZVXEXJOQARAQABtCpIYW5uZXMgUmVp
 bmVja2UgKFN1U0UgTGFicykgPGhhcmVAc3VzZS5kZT6JAkEEEwECACsCGwMFCRLMAwAGCwkI
 BwMCBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheABQJOisquAhkBAAoJEGz4yi9OyKjPOHoQAJLeLvr6JNHx
 GPcHXaJLHQiinz2QP0/wtsT8+hE26dLzxb7hgxLafj9XlAXOG3FhGd+ySlQ5wSbbjdxNjgsq
 FIjqQ88/Lk1NfnqG5aUTPmhEF+PzkPogEV7Pm5Q17ap22VK623MPaltEba+ly6/pGOODbKBH
 ak3gqa7Gro5YCQzNU0QVtMpWyeGF7xQK76DY/atvAtuVPBJHER+RPIF7iv5J3/GFIfdrM+wS
 BubFVDOibgM7UBnpa7aohZ9RgPkzJpzECsbmbttxYaiv8+EOwark4VjvOne8dRaj50qeyJH6
 HLpBXZDJH5ZcYJPMgunghSqghgfuUsd5fHmjFr3hDb5EoqAfgiRMSDom7wLZ9TGtT6viDldv
 hfWaIOD5UhpNYxfNgH6Y102gtMmN4o2P6g3UbZK1diH13s9DA5vI2mO2krGz2c5BOBmcctE5
 iS+JWiCizOqia5Op+B/tUNye/YIXSC4oMR++Fgt30OEafB8twxydMAE3HmY+foawCpGq06yM
 vAguLzvm7f6wAPesDAO9vxRNC5y7JeN4Kytl561ciTICmBR80Pdgs/Obj2DwM6dvHquQbQrU
 Op4XtD3eGUW4qgD99DrMXqCcSXX/uay9kOG+fQBfK39jkPKZEuEV2QdpE4Pry36SUGfohSNq
 xXW+bMc6P+irTT39VWFUJMcSuQINBE6KyREBEACvEJggkGC42huFAqJcOcLqnjK83t4TVwEn
 JRisbY/VdeZIHTGtcGLqsALDzk+bEAcZapguzfp7cySzvuR6Hyq7hKEjEHAZmI/3IDc9nbdh
 EgdCiFatah0XZ/p4vp7KAelYqbv8YF/ORLylAdLh9rzLR6yHFqVaR4WL4pl4kEWwFhNSHLxe
 55G56/dxBuoj4RrFoX3ynerXfbp4dH2KArPc0NfoamqebuGNfEQmDbtnCGE5zKcR0zvmXsRp
 qU7+caufueZyLwjTU+y5p34U4PlOO2Q7/bdaPEdXfpgvSpWk1o3H36LvkPV/PGGDCLzaNn04
 BdiiiPEHwoIjCXOAcR+4+eqM4TSwVpTn6SNgbHLjAhCwCDyggK+3qEGJph+WNtNU7uFfscSP
 k4jqlxc8P+hn9IqaMWaeX9nBEaiKffR7OKjMdtFFnBRSXiW/kOKuuRdeDjL5gWJjY+IpdafP
 KhjvUFtfSwGdrDUh3SvB5knSixE3qbxbhbNxmqDVzyzMwunFANujyyVizS31DnWC6tKzANkC
 k15CyeFC6sFFu+WpRxvC6fzQTLI5CRGAB6FAxz8Hu5rpNNZHsbYs9Vfr/BJuSUfRI/12eOCL
 IvxRPpmMOlcI4WDW3EDkzqNAXn5Onx/b0rFGFpM4GmSPriEJdBb4M4pSD6fN6Y/Jrng/Bdwk
 SQARAQABiQIlBBgBAgAPBQJOiskRAhsMBQkSzAMAAAoJEGz4yi9OyKjPgEwQAIP/gy/Xqc1q
 OpzfFScswk3CEoZWSqHxn/fZasa4IzkwhTUmukuIvRew+BzwvrTxhHcz9qQ8hX7iDPTZBcUt
 ovWPxz+3XfbGqE+q0JunlIsP4N+K/I10nyoGdoFpMFMfDnAiMUiUatHRf9Wsif/nT6oRiPNJ
 T0EbbeSyIYe+ZOMFfZBVGPqBCbe8YMI+JiZeez8L9JtegxQ6O3EMQ//1eoPJ5mv5lWXLFQfx
 f4rAcKseM8DE6xs1+1AIsSIG6H+EE3tVm+GdCkBaVAZo2VMVapx9k8RMSlW7vlGEQsHtI0FT
 c1XNOCGjaP4ITYUiOpfkh+N0nUZVRTxWnJqVPGZ2Nt7xCk7eoJWTSMWmodFlsKSgfblXVfdM
 9qoNScM3u0b9iYYuw/ijZ7VtYXFuQdh0XMM/V6zFrLnnhNmg0pnK6hO1LUgZlrxHwLZk5X8F
 uD/0MCbPmsYUMHPuJd5dSLUFTlejVXIbKTSAMd0tDSP5Ms8Ds84z5eHreiy1ijatqRFWFJRp
 ZtWlhGRERnDH17PUXDglsOA08HCls0PHx8itYsjYCAyETlxlLApXWdVl9YVwbQpQ+i693t/Y
 PGu8jotn0++P19d3JwXW8t6TVvBIQ1dRZHx1IxGLMn+CkDJMOmHAUMWTAXX2rf5tUjas8/v2
 azzYF4VRJsdl+d0MCaSy8mUh
Message-ID: <32880159-86e8-5c48-1532-181fdea0df96@suse.de>
Date:   Wed, 13 Nov 2019 15:06:12 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1573652209-163505-4-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 11/13/19 2:36 PM, John Garry wrote:
> Some SCSI HBAs (such as HPSA, megaraid, mpt3sas, hisi_sas_v3 ..) support
> multiple reply queues with single hostwide tags.
> 
> In addition, these drivers want to use interrupt assignment in
> pci_alloc_irq_vectors(PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY). However, as discussed in [0],
> CPU hotplug may cause in-flight IO completion to not be serviced when an
> interrupt is shutdown.
> 
> To solve that problem, Ming's patchset to drain hctx's should ensure no
> IOs are missed in-flight [1].
> 
> However, to take advantage of that patchset, we need to map the HBA HW
> queues to blk mq hctx's; to do that, we need to expose the HBA HW queues.
> 
> In making that transition, the per-SCSI command request tags are no
> longer unique per Scsi host - they are just unique per hctx. As such, the
> HBA LLDD would have to generate this tag internally, which has a certain
> performance overhead.
> 
> However another problem is that blk mq assumes the host may accept
> (Scsi_host.can_queue * #hw queue) commands. In [2], we removed the Scsi
> host busy counter, which would stop the LLDD being sent more than
> .can_queue commands; however, we should still ensure that the block layer
> does not issue more than .can_queue commands to the Scsi host.
> 
> To solve this problem, introduce a shared tags per blk_mq_tag_set, which
> may be requested when allocating the tagset.
> 
> New flag BLK_MQ_F_TAG_HCTX_SHARED should be set when requesting the
> tagset.
> 
> This is based on work originally from Ming Lei in [3].
> 
> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/alpine.DEB.2.21.1904051331270.1802@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20191014015043.25029-1-ming.lei@redhat.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20191025065855.6309-1-ming.lei@redhat.com/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20190531022801.10003-1-ming.lei@redhat.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c       |  1 +
>  block/blk-flush.c      |  2 +
>  block/blk-mq-debugfs.c |  2 +-
>  block/blk-mq-tag.c     | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  block/blk-mq-tag.h     |  1 +
>  block/blk-mq.c         | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  block/blk-mq.h         |  9 +++++
>  include/linux/blk-mq.h |  3 ++
>  include/linux/blkdev.h |  1 +
>  9 files changed, 155 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
[ .. ]
> @@ -396,15 +398,17 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_get_request(struct request_queue *q,
>  		blk_mq_tag_busy(data->hctx);
>  	}
>  
> -	tag = blk_mq_get_tag(data);
> -	if (tag == BLK_MQ_TAG_FAIL) {
> -		if (clear_ctx_on_error)
> -			data->ctx = NULL;
> -		blk_queue_exit(q);
> -		return NULL;
> +	if (data->hctx->shared_tags) {
> +		shared_tag = blk_mq_get_shared_tag(data);
> +		if (shared_tag == BLK_MQ_TAG_FAIL)
> +			goto err_shared_tag;
>  	}
>  
> -	rq = blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(data, tag, data->cmd_flags, alloc_time_ns);
> +	tag = blk_mq_get_tag(data);
> +	if (tag == BLK_MQ_TAG_FAIL)
> +		goto err_tag;
> +
> +	rq = blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(data, tag, shared_tag, data->cmd_flags, alloc_time_ns);
>  	if (!op_is_flush(data->cmd_flags)) {
>  		rq->elv.icq = NULL;
>  		if (e && e->type->ops.prepare_request) {
Why do you need to keep a parallel tag accounting between 'normal' and
'shared' tags here?
Isn't is sufficient to get a shared tag only, and us that in lieo of the
'real' one?

I would love to combine both, as then we can easily do a reverse mapping
by using the 'tag' value to lookup the command itself, and can possibly
do the 'scsi_cmd_priv' trick of embedding the LLDD-specific parts within
the command. With this split we'll be wasting quite some memory there,
as the possible 'tag' values are actually nr_hw_queues * shared_tags.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@suse.de			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 247165 (AG München), GF: Felix Imendörffer