Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp2165657ybc; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:58:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw2B260VmFSFIWU+VSSWxSelEMnT2mZKLr45cyCGAXq6wt8xPVbY8Gf6tjwSxrkSoUUJxc9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6a8e:: with SMTP id p14mr4098354ejr.137.1573667895801; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:58:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573667895; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FTWOb5zegYyyqPPHC5F89DUFyo8Gt+9aMkiLE/k4iLcX/bvrBiHblayNL+QhAB1mad lMk+Ni9EZ758F823qM0DjeZfMDKlifrRXHgu38JyabAcFC3ZRu9UiZyv9/rzAg/7rKe6 7obte7OwJToaGGZMDiEv1s7u/B6ho1MOQBah+LbEU3NVf5uz7B/6zmdwcRBjL9Ox7iC8 r2dtt8U7vt9Kc0bVlrFBLxSdWPqyi2/wb/EaFWkFl7B4j0XLECT9NpGl/E17lbZXcMex Wi+IhAvNWV7xRnIHtTZVN0flbZ0oqIr6jfJdjSxpZSLX6l/qDenOgrRq40aD6byUvbdK PJPg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=qYBYA0B9LwL1Ha3UAlhRReXxDTq5ZLXKkHKgZif6j/g=; b=h0dzEMrBHqCH2dnUGkkqOwQXf1RGbP/zymSRqbfnhKUMXL769IbGo4zZHFfvl66az1 Mz+82QUJpEg+G3p1VZah/k/FOgIxZpUdZuZcoK/Z9x/KIlIgpwu663ZKx6dpasVupebN QXTWCfDob3aQDafNV90zB3kuN+iQ5ofXSN+eOoHB3EMUbSAWYc6cJarJPr5/clYKP1BT MzlA5fX5VStFFD9bOmIReaUwmvIbH/E7G8ri6VRHT521rvIGGXREBXQovkTu+IoFlebN PWj0uVXHECC3u1dMZBc4aMlqJ5PKY8EhgUI5W4kZNykJEC+jGev6UxG82Mp52TUX2Lqm i/xg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ny24si1639702ejb.317.2019.11.13.09.57.51; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:58:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727987AbfKMR5M (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:57:12 -0500 Received: from szxga04-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.190]:6656 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726105AbfKMR5M (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:57:12 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 0ED179AD0C9DB477799E; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 01:57:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.202.226.61) by DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 01:57:02 +0800 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 17:56:55 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Dan Williams CC: Tao Xu , Linux MM , Linux ACPI , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux ARM , X86 ML , "Keith Busch" , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Glisse , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Linuxarm , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/4] ACPI: Support Generic Initiator only domains Message-ID: <20191113175655.00005db9@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20191004114330.104746-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <20191004114330.104746-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> <20191113094742.00000dc4@huawei.com> <77b6a6e8-9d44-1e1c-3bf0-a8d04833598d@intel.com> Organization: Huawei X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.202.226.61] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:52:46 -0800 Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 5:57 AM Tao Xu wrote: > > > > On 11/13/2019 5:47 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 09:55:17 -0800 > > > Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > >> [ add Tao Xu ] > > >> > > >> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:45 AM Jonathan Cameron > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Generic Initiators are a new ACPI concept that allows for the > > >>> description of proximity domains that contain a device which > > >>> performs memory access (such as a network card) but neither > > >>> host CPU nor Memory. > > >>> > > >>> This patch has the parsing code and provides the infrastructure > > >>> for an architecture to associate these new domains with their > > >>> nearest memory processing node. > > >> > > >> Thanks for this Jonathan. May I ask how this was tested? Tao has been > > >> working on qemu support for HMAT [1]. I have not checked if it already > > >> supports generic initiator entries, but it would be helpful to include > > >> an example of how the kernel sees these configurations in practice. > > >> > > >> [1]: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1096737/ > > > > > > Tested against qemu with SRAT and SLIT table overrides from an > > > initrd to actually create the node and give it distances > > > (those all turn up correctly in the normal places). DSDT override > > > used to move an emulated network card into the GI numa node. That > > > currently requires the PCI patch referred to in the cover letter. > > > On arm64 tested both on qemu and real hardware (overrides on tables > > > even for real hardware as I can't persuade our BIOS team to implement > > > Generic Initiators until an OS is actually using them.) > > > > > > Main real requirement is memory allocations then occur from one of > > > the nodes at the minimal distance when you are do a devm_ allocation > > > from a device assigned. Also need to be able to query the distances > > > to allow load balancing etc. All that works as expected. > > > > > > It only has a fairly tangential connection to HMAT in that HMAT > > > can provide information on GI nodes. Given HMAT code is quite happy > > > with memoryless nodes anyway it should work. QEMU doesn't currently > > > have support to create GI SRAT entries let alone HMAT using them. > > > > > > Whilst I could look at adding such support to QEMU, it's not > > > exactly high priority to emulate something we can test easily > > > by overriding the tables before the kernel reads them. > > > > > > I'll look at how hard it is to build an HMAT tables for my test > > > configs based on the ones I used to test your HMAT patches a while > > > back. Should be easy if tedious. > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > > Indeed, HMAT can support Generic Initiator, but as far as I know, QEMU > > only can emulate a node with cpu and memory, or memory-only. Even if we > > assign a node with cpu only, qemu will raise error. Considering > > compatibility, there are lots of work to do for QEMU if we change NUMA > > or SRAT table. > > Thanks for the background. It would still be a useful feature to be > able to define a memory + generic-initiator node in qemu. That will > mirror real world accelerators with local memory configurations. Ah crossed with my essay. This simple case you have here is easier to discuss. Lets call it a GPU on a coherent interconnect with local memory. What do you think should happen for access0 in sysfs? Do we want the GPU reflected in there or not? This particular case doesn't actually need a GI, though perhaps you might want one purely to give HMAT based info. On a pre GI system you would just use a memory only node and use DSDT _PXM to put the GPU device in it. Whilst I agree a means of testing this in qemu might be more friendly than doing it by overriding tables, the overriding route lets you do the crazy corner cases + generate 'invalid' tables which are also useful for testing. Thanks, Jonathan