Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 13 Nov 2019 10:33:38 -0800
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
        kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] add support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack
Message-ID: <201911131033.435C8F77D@keescook>
References: <20191018161033.261971-1-samitolvanen@google.com>
 <20191105235608.107702-1-samitolvanen@google.com>
 <201911121530.FA3D7321F@keescook>
 <20191113120337.GA26599@willie-the-truck>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191113120337.GA26599@willie-the-truck>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:03:38PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:44:42PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 03:55:54PM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > > This patch series adds support for Clang's Shadow Call Stack
> > > (SCS) mitigation, which uses a separately allocated shadow stack
> > > to protect against return address overwrites. More information
> > 
> > Will, Catalin, Mark,
> > 
> > What's the next step here? I *think* all the comments have been
> > addressed. Is it possible to land this via the arm tree for v5.5?
> 
> I was planning to queue this for 5.6, given that I'd really like it to
> spend some quality time in linux-next.

Sounds fine to me; I just wanted to have an idea what to expect. :)
Thanks!

-- 
Kees Cook