Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
To:     Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hch@lst.de, sj1557.seo@samsung.com,
        linkinjeon@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] add the latest exfat driver
In-Reply-To: <20191113081800.7672-1-namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
References: <CGME20191113082216epcas1p2e712c23c9524e04be624ccc822b59bf0@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
 <20191113081800.7672-1-namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1573670900_10801P";
         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:48:20 -0500
Message-ID: <286809.1573670900@turing-police>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

--==_Exmh_1573670900_10801P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 03:17:47 -0500, Namjae Jeon said:
> This adds the latest Samsung exfat driver to fs/exfat. This is an
> implementation of the Microsoft exFAT specification. Previous versions
> of this shipped with millions of Android phones, an a random previous
> snaphot has been merged in drivers/staging/.
>
> Compared to the sdfat driver shipped on the phones the following changes
> have been made:
>
>  - the support for vfat has been removed as that is already supported
>    by fs/fat
>  - driver has been renamed to exfat
>  - the code has been refactored and clean up to fully integrate into
>    the upstream Linux version and follow the Linux coding style
>  - metadata operations like create, lookup and readdir have been further
>    optimized
>  - various major and minor bugs have been fixed
>
> We plan to treat this version as the future upstream for the code base
> once merged, and all new features and bug fixes will go upstream first.

For the record, I'm totally OK with this and glad to see more up-to-date code
than the codebase I was working from.

--==_Exmh_1573670900_10801P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018
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=1doZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1573670900_10801P--