Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp2848197ybc; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 23:22:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwncjg+UiTa0KKWsJx3Gazx2VhfjHjqHo/l75tGfDu6Q1GC1BzBy3gceXJr5HD9wX1cWj9E X-Received: by 2002:a50:c3c5:: with SMTP id i5mr8291490edf.137.1573716145256; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 23:22:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573716145; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=N/M9RnTkVCkZroilvWCz71yWgTO2OjArJuCqEzQ+GXA+YAArgCUZ1KA8DFzUm0tm13 YY8DPUh06sWM/rLeY6BNEIgo35zEyXf58v6ptFWqYFupuZMgG8L+maQ5ZsJwoeVcEjVH LWuBSUctDmHicyzGMsctqPdoCg+3wySpW6hRKzgECM0X/nwvRddvUG/aE8qCGVzrBobD V9sqYyacXwdL2cB9ZNxidlCtfxOGE5wSQUMTYaovQ2oRJzP83p5tGjkTEwzQzeU896Eb i70c4VRu+Ho6+7fjHznciRu08FqULz1+vWtNOe5sdKpd52+0fpQ7UVi0Z2m2G++2hDYa eSzQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=nxB8NLTgTVu6/8qembEAv5JwGECu2yY94RHyG+HpQ44=; b=0OaLlDgZx1EYSsTke4NgQOy2c3FWJJzJYMClT/tv3VSHA6T/JVltcz4oZ32CU3KmHF kCxG6VmzPtUOf8OnpkVZh4Syt6wowc3ViZHFk6clW7G7HRjpVR43mV69dBIct0RXtTjB m+0j5H3arKN3Ue+znRgt6t4T4Wk36/bPaIhjVI0wTkudz9Yq/j/r3MBO6Njeov1YthhZ ZJmw0+j+HGNHkGISPEPrWh0QRgrl1uqWI2LQ3SRW0cbxEV7RYow4QifMzmNKxUGhWd8l tM/T71xzuamrelPGEliS7VjORmF5HPh6jBbBcscGxmaVFMrlJ6qyRaYGJ19G9H8B6Bmt ZT5w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u4si2771751ejx.3.2019.11.13.23.22.00; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 23:22:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726599AbfKNHTG (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 02:19:06 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:37919 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725838AbfKNHTF (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 02:19:05 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 2FE8B68AFE; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:19:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 08:19:03 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dan Williams Cc: jhubbard@nvidia.com, Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , Ira Weiny , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Cleanup __put_devmap_managed_page() vs ->page_free() Message-ID: <20191114071903.GA26307@lst.de> References: <157368992671.2974225.13512647385398246617.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <157368992671.2974225.13512647385398246617.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 04:07:22PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote: > static int devmap_managed_enable_get(struct dev_pagemap *pgmap) > { > - if (!pgmap->ops || !pgmap->ops->page_free) { > + if (!pgmap->ops || (pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE > + && !pgmap->ops->page_free)) { I don't think this check is correct. You only want the the ops null check or MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE as well now, i.e.: if (pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_PRIVATE && (!pgmap->ops || !pgmap->ops->page_free)) { > @@ -476,10 +471,17 @@ void __put_devmap_managed_page(struct page *page) > * handled differently or not done at all, so there is no need > * to clear page->mapping. > */ > - if (is_device_private_page(page)) > - page->mapping = NULL; > + if (is_device_private_page(page)) { > + /* Clear Active bit in case of parallel mark_page_accessed */ This adds a > 80 char line. But that whole flow of the function seems rather odd now. Why can't we do: if (count == 0) { __put_page(page); } else if (is_device_private_page(page)) { __ClearPageActive(page); __ClearPageWaiters(page); mem_cgroup_uncharge(page); page->mapping = NULL; page->pgmap->ops->page_free(page); } else { wake_up_var(&page->_refcount); } (except for the fact that I don't get the point of calling __put_page on a refcount of zero, but that is separate from this patch).