Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov
To:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc:     MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Organization: Samsung Electronics
Message-ID: <754ec843-eb8f-5149-bf7f-ec4abf938821@samsung.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:39:01 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
        Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx-tUtnX0T47YGdf7-cgp6e8K9Rgb34Mfe5Za9L4YMGS1g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
CMS-TYPE: 101P
DLP-Filter: Pass
References: <CGME20190724014230epcas5p371a5fdee330f91a646d619fbcc024acf@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
        <20190724014222.110767-1-saravanak@google.com>
        <cb0d4aad-81e4-0b8d-40f2-7f58ef1e38d9@samsung.com>
        <CAGETcx-tUtnX0T47YGdf7-cgp6e8K9Rgb34Mfe5Za9L4YMGS1g@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Saravana,

On 11/14/19 5:23 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:48 PM Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Saravana,
>>
>> Any other progress of this series?
> 
> Hi Chanwoo,
> 
> Thanks for checking. I haven't abandoned this patch series. This patch
> series depends on "lazy linking" of required-opps to avoid a cyclic
> dependency between devfreq and OPP table population. But Viresh wasn't
> happy with my implementation of the lazy liking for reasonable
> reasons.
> 
> I had a chat with Viresh during one of the several conferences that I
> met him at. To fix the lazy linking in the way he wanted it meant we
> had to fix other issues in the OPP framework that arise when OPP
> tables are shared in DT but not in memory. So he was kind enough to
> sign up to add lazy linking support to OPPs so that I won't have to do
> it. So, I'm waiting on that. So once that's added, I should be able to
> drop a few patches in this series, do some minor updates and then this
> will be good to go.

Thanks for the detailed explanation. I'll expect the your next version.

Thanks,
Chanwoo Choi