Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:53:25 +0100
From:   Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
        bfq-iosched@googlegroups.com, Chris Evich <cevich@redhat.com>,
        Patrick Dung <patdung100@gmail.com>,
        Thorsten Schubert <tschubert@bafh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH BUGFIX] block, bfq: deschedule empty bfq_queues not
 referred by any process
In-Reply-To: <69B451DE-B04B-4E0E-9464-826C4A7619AD@linaro.org>
References: <20191112074856.40433-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>
 <bb393dcaa426786e0963cf0e70f0b062@natalenko.name>
 <2FB3736A-693E-44B9-9D1F-39AE0D016644@linaro.org>
 <65fc0bffbcb2296d121b3d5a79108e76@natalenko.name>
 <5773ff54421ccf179ef57d96e19ef042@natalenko.name>
 <69B451DE-B04B-4E0E-9464-826C4A7619AD@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.0
Message-ID: <5b0b07fc8e50a1beac215230ca84d955@natalenko.name>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi.

On 13.11.2019 18:42, Paolo Valente wrote:
>> Il giorno 13 nov 2019, alle ore 16:01, Oleksandr Natalenko 
>> <oleksandr@natalenko.name> ha scritto:
> Ok, you may have given me enough information, thank you very much.
> 
> Could you please apply the attached (compressed) patch on top of my
> offending patch?  For review purposes, here is the simple change:
> 
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -2728,7 +2728,8 @@ void bfq_release_process_ref(struct bfq_data
> *bfqd, struct bfq_queue *bfqq)
>          * freed when dequeued from service. But this is assumed to
>          * never happen.
>          */
> -       if (bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq) && RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list))
> +       if (bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq) && RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&bfqq->sort_list) &&
> +           bfqq != bfqd->in_service_queue)
>                 bfq_del_bfqq_busy(bfqd, bfqq, false);
> 
>         bfq_put_queue(bfqq);

The issue is not reproducible for me after applying this patch.

Thank you.

-- 
   Oleksandr Natalenko (post-factum)