Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp3123069ybc; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 04:24:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxg1NycM+HFYrfd2N0uxth3lS2qyUvzujeaNwH/R+jYoYF2bjIRcIwp2FSMp62bGbhmZcVB X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:970a:: with SMTP id k10mr7837971ejx.314.1573734292726; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 04:24:52 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573734292; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZjTkdwqUAIjb22DYfEfIYGZxekEhP9Bc2+wb8tK+k9LjOoICL7K8jtukAxGfxhZ+Uo HRxuMAKXIInjZOFnMMK/s3wFrM2SUfzAAvSMukXyzvLl6XcCtWuSXElLKCSitN9CzMoG ZJG2Yvl2zPCuMIfaw9bLY9cTh0DWTuxwGBIke71h8lPbPWfHBF2mw697gttSMXOFohJ4 RD0YJ5ie6BwesMhs4lgCtC0IuxrJ6GARMCRAW/cSjWilMwz/CYGgP8g7qDZgskvg56ai 1R6ghXVmweGECsFbmMLGtrU88H3o1Rn7HFxjfuGEPizKwNzaqzheHqbH8OJVEpuEYCu9 3CUw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:organization:from:references:cc:to:subject :dkim-signature; bh=PZX7pGUHhWmTDW+4G9DVRk0+x/DIsEoLM1+7MqBPpmg=; b=q6dN1eLGbcMzs+26/VvEn2new7PKgYjaqgcU+MvnxOgKz024kqflD6D/wKBwm0365W eW6a7W6FhAJPsPEgM8hazE4ILa8ZaqX/AvVZULPz9MdC9EEqcNRdiiBz3Pa7ezVA96je 9lsDzSv1uPlNilAsh50IQl89UtQiVDsviBIRhIONHwwl2gu86zjGZ2ApK6anAHwAN9lk aCMxcYt9y6ypSH7WQaSL/7NA2WEgQxMYm7uTED/5nr1rkw+Ji4vmxDgs5V0MKDGF9ejl aUK84IQGZ8gM0UTa7eVkfShHCv77tgpo4dlrvsY3g2QTOLIPp6U7vMzNMuJey1DHkWo+ DGAQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=B7dmBbpa; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h14si4446859edj.225.2019.11.14.04.24.28; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 04:24:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=B7dmBbpa; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726263AbfKNMVe (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:21:34 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:22491 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726106AbfKNMVe (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:21:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1573734092; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PZX7pGUHhWmTDW+4G9DVRk0+x/DIsEoLM1+7MqBPpmg=; b=B7dmBbpau4dVYxMwSicg9fysX+OqldBVSz3zzZFa+fmVbvLnDBGVLoEDIYcPwIkBp/y5Qe dlkowGO82urZzHglN4KD/AjlJqbnEGNRRNdG5qDzr762QaP3tG7Xj4DO7tXM6mRVvguOAA Q2zIbZPF0oSVmmEv4N3grv2O0G/Uy8I= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-62-fGPYAQngOrqdrOVl2fN1jg-1; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 07:21:29 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48110800C77; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.117.13] (ovpn-117-13.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.13]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5E55ED4B; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:21:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 01/12] powerpc/pseries: CMM: Implement release() function for sysfs device To: Michael Ellerman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Mackerras , Allison Randal , Arun KS , Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Thomas Gleixner , Vlastimil Babka References: <47DFy90198z9sSZ@ozlabs.org> From: David Hildenbrand Organization: Red Hat GmbH Message-ID: <8e2dc539-e4fc-6eae-568c-21a8e809c0fc@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 13:21:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <47DFy90198z9sSZ@ozlabs.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-MC-Unique: fGPYAQngOrqdrOVl2fN1jg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 14.11.19 10:08, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Thu, 2019-10-31 at 14:29:22 UTC, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> When unloading the module, one gets >> [ 548.188594] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [ 548.188596] Device 'cmm0' does not have a release() function, it is b= rok=3D >> en and must be fixed. See Documentation/kobject.txt. >> [ 548.188622] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 19308 at drivers/base/core.c:1244 .d= evi=3D >> ce_release+0xcc/0xf0 >> ... >> >> We only have on static fake device. There is nothing to do when >> releasing the device (via cmm_exit). >> >> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt >> Cc: Paul Mackerras >> Cc: Michael Ellerman >> Cc: Andrew Morton >> Cc: Vlastimil Babka >> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov >> Cc: Allison Randal >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner >> Cc: Arun KS >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand >=20 > Patches 1-10 applied to powerpc next, thanks. >=20 > https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/7d8212747435c534c8d564fbef4541a463c976ff >=20 > cheers >=20 Thanks! I'll probably resend patch 11/12 to give it more attention and=20 to fixup one comment leftover in patch 11. I guess if we get ACKs these=20 two patch should also go via your tree to avoid collisions. --=20 Thanks, David / dhildenb