Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; 
  s=zapps768; d=zoho.com; 
  h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type; 
  b=rS/Sv/W/XTTB732XTmLvO2SKxpu527ONZfwoMWJfPePzPb4OGQ/RXZtUZVl3dCa7qzq7+ARHheEy
    ogEj26PAf93WhSmeZZvuw25ndr75SSEjVCuab1Wb/o68YoQB2UO3  
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v3] dt-bindings: clock: Add X1000 bindings.
To:     Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
References: <1571421006-12771-1-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@zoho.com>
 <1573378102-72380-1-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@zoho.com>
 <1573378102-72380-2-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@zoho.com>
 <20191112005544.GB7038@bogus>
Cc:     linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        mturquette@baylibre.com, paul.burton@mips.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, syq@debian.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        paul@crapouillou.net
From:   Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@zoho.com>
Message-ID: <5DCD56C5.1050106@zoho.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Nov 2019 21:29:41 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191112005544.GB7038@bogus>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Rob,

On 2019=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8812=E6=97=A5 08:55, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 17:28:21 +0800, Zhou Yanjie wrote:
>> Add the clock bindings for the X1000 Soc from Ingenic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@zoho.com>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.txt      |  1 +
>>   include/dt-bindings/clock/x1000-cgu.h              | 44 ++++++++++++++=
++++++++
>>   2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/x1000-cgu.h
>>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

I'm sorry, it's my mistake, I forgot to add these tags.
I'll pay more attention on this next time.

Best regards=EF=BC=81