Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp3461633ybc; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:24:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzBmaruRguqO/gPzQb4Qsl9bZElAiGE8ypmm0A1RefMGpbh9gQbsLNHy7ofLts4NAxz+9yc X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a3cc:: with SMTP id ca12mr9631761ejb.302.1573752296219; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:24:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573752296; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pizLQ9mod5mn6UI7wwrxfpNy9Fl0sH1PxjMqguB4bGdpd76zb/VaGJYqv5I/YdbtYh NTb0r/rdRCWgUcj3ebhgCyDXCj8Ln8xakaAYRNW+fqwtHomOH9z79e4gi06w95n4/vA7 ZsiGQKLPWNAMsDYOMsl314HeBScjyusn9+NIlWJS04oGbn0R09Zi/I6OTByPV25UQ13x ZGuS0PqaSjtK3wMWDeoHQNwN5wargWW7QLyf50auZqqC9+pu+Bh8Ew6fvswqcub0BEXn pNnyP3F+bOe1XvJQftPnDA68C+bcHvVISlLLg6Mykuj0+dgmT4td2xNW52iZAV2GMI/6 zoPA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=N9rmz05bNPQonq7c1xMHpozGyt1jE/vZTnE7WRjHon0=; b=SQxUCxKngFDgSBwDgL84+eiUqzYfPTi+LwXgK2K2e/uq4hUPomrp4lBwgzgjAwrGs3 8GUpS3QbFAPERS076x3h4xqNoXXByfBvBK668tzIzE5oJ0cfw/RoUyh0cJDEVpFlidwo pyZ7VmsH3IBOypjqpt4aC/GnKgog0cAgJ9Vn1yB+asb+LEA8dEydyIutu1jJToHDwHcd ISTpJKoScapGnl3y2JRZXM2/SUCBsn2zRQLuryixDZaYGOueLh5bksGDGa/2cdl17G2z H/AfmeegYEmP1ST4+rsbIM24uIkEbtkpY72KDf8lhBA/K++VWyb5IW05Zr+S9Bck+Pzm tzSA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a11si5480440edj.143.2019.11.14.09.24.29; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 09:24:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726818AbfKNRUi (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:20:38 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49452 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726533AbfKNRUi (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:20:38 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E26F2070E; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:20:34 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Joel Fernandes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ioannis Ilkos , minchan@google.com, primiano@google.com, fmayer@google.com, hjd@google.com, joaodias@google.com, lalitm@google.com, rslawik@google.com, sspatil@google.com, timmurray@google.com, Andrew Morton , Andy Shevchenko , Changbin Du , Ingo Molnar , Joe Perches , Kees Cook , linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko , Petr Mladek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Sakari Ailus , Sergey Senozhatsky , Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: [PATCH] rss_stat: Add support to detect RSS updates of external mm Message-ID: <20191114122034.4adeb78d@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20191114164622.GC233237@google.com> References: <20191106024452.81923-1-joel@joelfernandes.org> <20191113153816.14b95acd@gandalf.local.home> <20191114164622.GC233237@google.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:46:22 -0500 Joel Fernandes wrote: > > Can we make a __ptr_to_hashval() static inline, and have > > ptr_to_hashval() call that, but use the static inline here, where the > > static_branch gets called directly here? > > Sure, like this? Yep. -- Steve