Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Thu, 14 Nov 2019 20:27:25 +0100
From:   Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
To:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe@baylibre.com>
Cc:     mark.rutland@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, wens@csie.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] ARM64: dts: allwinner: Add devicetree for pineH64
 modelB
Message-ID: <20191114192725.GX4345@gilmour.lan>
References: <1573746453-5123-1-git-send-email-clabbe@baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JVdfu60Euw8Ey+/T"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1573746453-5123-1-git-send-email-clabbe@baylibre.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk


--JVdfu60Euw8Ey+/T
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:47:31PM +0000, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> Hello
>
> Pineh64 have two existing model (A and B) with some hardware difference and
> so need two different DT file.
> But the current situation has only one file for both.
> This serie fix this situation by being more clear on which DT file is
> needed for both model.

sorry I didn't tell you on v1, the prefix for arm64 is lowercase
(unlike arm where it's uppercase).

I've fixed it while applying, thanks!
Maxime
--JVdfu60Euw8Ey+/T
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRcEzekXsqa64kGDp7j7w1vZxhRxQUCXc2qnQAKCRDj7w1vZxhR
xSWVAQCBPr2s0WW9ArMBn4OEKu8Q5C7BaeyG22Vq1rN5Z8PwVgEA533j7d1rP19K
sGwHnhtbWexfClKTTe+6B1qfHaK5jwo=
=AIGJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--JVdfu60Euw8Ey+/T--