Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CGME20190724014230epcas5p371a5fdee330f91a646d619fbcc024acf@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
 <20190724014222.110767-1-saravanak@google.com> <cb0d4aad-81e4-0b8d-40f2-7f58ef1e38d9@samsung.com>
 <CAGETcx-tUtnX0T47YGdf7-cgp6e8K9Rgb34Mfe5Za9L4YMGS1g@mail.gmail.com> <20191114083532.vmccmqgj2uj73tcn@vireshk-i7>
In-Reply-To: <20191114083532.vmccmqgj2uj73tcn@vireshk-i7>
From:   Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:39:06 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGETcx9ccBgH2cjHMuecLRNJzTZTC_WZSGiWT-476Dqf2vADkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add required-opps support to devfreq passive gov
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc:     Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
        Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:35 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 14-11-19, 00:23, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > Thanks for checking. I haven't abandoned this patch series. This patch
> > series depends on "lazy linking" of required-opps to avoid a cyclic
> > dependency between devfreq and OPP table population. But Viresh wasn't
> > happy with my implementation of the lazy liking for reasonable
> > reasons.
> >
> > I had a chat with Viresh during one of the several conferences that I
> > met him at. To fix the lazy linking in the way he wanted it meant we
> > had to fix other issues in the OPP framework that arise when OPP
> > tables are shared in DT but not in memory. So he was kind enough to
> > sign up to add lazy linking support to OPPs so that I won't have to do
> > it. So, I'm waiting on that. So once that's added, I should be able to
> > drop a few patches in this series, do some minor updates and then this
> > will be good to go.
>
> I am fixing few other issues in OPP core right now and lazy linking
> is next in the list :)

Thanks Viresh! Glad the offer still stands :)

-Saravana