Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v9] kexec: Fix i386 build warnings that missed
 declaration of struct kimage
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
        hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, bhe@redhat.com, dyoung@redhat.com,
        jgross@suse.com, dhowells@redhat.com, Thomas.Lendacky@amd.com,
        ebiederm@xmission.com, vgoyal@redhat.com, d.hatayama@fujitsu.com,
        horms@verge.net.au, kexec@lists.infradead.org
References: <20191108090027.11082-1-lijiang@redhat.com>
 <20191108090027.11082-4-lijiang@redhat.com> <20191114123920.GA7222@zn.tnic>
 <59fbd119-495a-4d00-9738-98c22b276c1f@redhat.com>
 <20191114144353.GB7222@zn.tnic>
From:   lijiang <lijiang@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <16a61f4d-a112-6766-0272-9cfd65e78503@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:18:02 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20191114144353.GB7222@zn.tnic>
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

=E5=9C=A8 2019=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8814=E6=97=A5 22:43, Borislav Petkov =E5=86=
=99=E9=81=93:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 10:20:42PM +0800, lijiang wrote:
>> I really saw my building result, but kbuild reported the following messa=
ges:
>>
>> vim +5 arch/x86/include/asm/crash.h
>>
>> dd5f726076cc76 Vivek Goyal 2014-08-08   4 =20
>> dd5f726076cc76 Vivek Goyal 2014-08-08  @5  int crash_load_segments(struc=
t kimage *image);
>> dd5f726076cc76 Vivek Goyal 2014-08-08   6  int crash_copy_backup_region(=
struct kimage *image);
>> dd5f726076cc76 Vivek Goyal 2014-08-08   7  int crash_setup_memmap_entrie=
s(struct kimage *image,
>> dd5f726076cc76 Vivek Goyal 2014-08-08   8  =09=09struct boot_params *par=
ams);
>> 89f579ce99f7e0 Yi Wang     2018-11-22   9  void crash_smp_send_stop(void=
);
>> dd5f726076cc76 Vivek Goyal 2014-08-08  10 =20
>>
>> :::::: The code at line 5 was first introduced by commit=20
>>        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> :::::: dd5f726076cc7639d9713b334c8c133f77c6757a kexec: support for kexec=
 on panic using new system call
>>        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^=
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>=20
> You should not take the report of a bot blindly but should always double
> check it. Like every other computer system programmed by humans, it can
> make mistakes.
>=20

Indeed, i totally agree.

>> Would you mind giving me any suggestions about this?
>=20
> I'll take care of it all and push the results out soon.
>=20

OK, thank you so much.

Lianbo