Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp4245735ybc; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 01:12:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxH6V1/CmTU6xVvCrK912jG37KTereXZpBf8OziZVqBT6H1wj21Azyb6f03ItOlY8JgZ2Eg X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4d99:: with SMTP id s25mr12764828eju.187.1573809166346; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 01:12:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573809166; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=aPWLfNW7a8TIiaiSPJ9RTW54fQEsqYi6fPGZwtiuPP+vEE5NpMWGK3YdKJ59H8o+/5 B85cWswdoylDo6ORB0OXlkDfs4MXjpQPvJSWwAD0ukJj4dR96oDu67AlQzfAZA8b/Ruc hIUpM3thJAFJibAdLZ31u5cd0h0AvMlFOTd1PEsp7RvsdV9YMxFDjW2FdyDJ5JVqBboc 5A6M4lZr5IRT0IR3sx9DIK18E3ytt7iwwVPdEEobe3CPSIQJeYSnMA97CXu1Di+uhOrw YHCqRNVxk6qp6rMYSYRctT9TcOmmn4jHja+Eny2toxJ9ZBiA50NQLGl1c3m9uysKhCaw BaJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from; bh=wupUmHEohh3/H+yzMmgR1Rt9TOMhtOnTJS9D6l+kvEg=; b=cbVZqr7meNsR39M/WVNlQSFKsgE9DUEkP3VhsUNUKV7b6N2QJuvvXfw0xxnS+61Vje q9lH0DO/JCvL59sC/E9Z7kPNazU4zxDtxFPYLyRnxPcyD7ZmdIfPWVuGY00PEyXSqqK+ vmRVydqji+kxIcHml4QXmQ2JBSqjYGyfJzfGugdYVmDaAhVxTfpAlTQM1UUWD2BFdgJ3 w9k1Z2meTBj85eKV+EZC8rtxLycE7ZYXbzDipDNJoU0w9NkJ3+pRWREHx3t89tcpcx6g 9ZuITzKMJOvLV7B61N2N489S2AUy5amZZlCi7Lm8X5RVDw3hDD+IKRcKFZeOIReTukLq 2+qA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p20si5530162edq.121.2019.11.15.01.12.20; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 01:12:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727406AbfKOJLH (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 04:11:07 -0500 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:60996 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727226AbfKOJLF (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 04:11:05 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 08D0A1035FF4266CBE18; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:11:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.124.28) by DGGEMS407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:10:52 +0800 From: Jason Yan To: , , , , , , , , CC: , , Jason Yan Subject: [PATCH 0/6] implement KASLR for powerpc/fsl_booke/64 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:32:03 +0800 Message-ID: <20191115093209.26434-1-yanaijie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.175.124.28] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is a try to implement KASLR for Freescale BookE64 which is based on my earlier implementation for Freescale BookE32: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=131718 The implementation for Freescale BookE64 is similar as BookE32. One difference is that Freescale BookE64 set up a TLB mapping of 1G during booting. Another difference is that ppc64 needs the kernel to be 64K-aligned. So we can randomize the kernel in this 1G mapping and make it 64K-aligned. This can save some code to creat another TLB map at early boot. The disadvantage is that we only have about 1G/64K = 16384 slots to put the kernel in. KERNELBASE 64K |--> kernel <--| | | | +--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ +--+--+ | | | |....| | | | | | | | | |....| | | +--+--+--+ +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ +--+--+ | | 1G |-----> offset <-----| kernstart_virt_addr I'm not sure if the slot numbers is enough or the design has any defects. If you have some better ideas, I would be happy to hear that. Thank you all. Jason Yan (6): powerpc/fsl_booke/kaslr: refactor kaslr_legal_offset() and kaslr_early_init() powerpc/fsl_booke/64: introduce reloc_kernel_entry() helper powerpc/fsl_booke/64: implement KASLR for fsl_booke64 powerpc/fsl_booke/64: do not clear the BSS for the second pass powerpc/fsl_booke/64: clear the original kernel if randomized powerpc/fsl_booke/kaslr: rename kaslr-booke32.rst to kaslr-booke.rst and add 64bit part .../{kaslr-booke32.rst => kaslr-booke.rst} | 35 ++++++++-- arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 2 +- arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64e.S | 13 ++++ arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S | 7 ++ arch/powerpc/kernel/setup_64.c | 4 +- arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_decl.h | 3 +- arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/kaslr_booke.c | 67 +++++++++++++------ 7 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) rename Documentation/powerpc/{kaslr-booke32.rst => kaslr-booke.rst} (59%) -- 2.17.2