Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <05ba4e29fb78885cf9abf7bfc87e0a7bcda099fe.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: whitelist Originally-by: signature
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2019 07:09:17 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20191115150202.15208-1-erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
References: <20191115150202.15208-1-erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.1-2 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 16:02 +0100, Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> Oftentimes [1], the contributor would like to honor or give credits [2]
> to somebody's original ideas in the submission/reviewing process. While
> "Co-developed-by:" and "Suggested-by:" (currently whitelisted) could be
> employed for this purpose, they are not ideal.

You need to get the use of this accepted into Documentation/process
before adding it to checkpatch