Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp4661593ybc; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:07:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzJ9ULTV6FNK1klfeEkinnxEnY0rCR14i+QCaiyONf5H38+BS27vRh9u0+V21Ffk5RFt668 X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4b08:: with SMTP id v8mr14882990wrq.338.1573834059481; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:07:39 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573834059; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zS/kRu5mGDIruqtDAc2Ek8Q5Prmwen/0vrHIc9BBFCF4fJUrSVXM6wVm89ABUTYqho /SN2z5rD6fGXQpK3USTgLKvc1xzPqiyiHPUao/julvINcGuCHBPUxBgP1KrYDzWF9SjQ yolkhVT0UIpH3r9I+ybydHuSNJvbA6IZ7527xKYiWqHyJC18dvRskMSi9brRV8Hi7fQn enRJVDAC82bccbvwsMLiypYDoy8f92of2SRTkvYWRd/bh6EWRF2HYJ0NifK4arvcMFdF YebVkMa/iK5eXw5hg7uZis7wLzr5JY4w+MJ51CtIX/IYZW7OBQrkfBx5JqE8sUpLUyxt 9MWQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=h4uz577dyaYxYjQd0B51dwR7I9VX3/DZkE9KJWLI50o=; b=vYGVNQ6MosfA+Ae4rZLeWFo1h//Nmkr1p4WVHtDY3yaPJbHcDWAmPC7BAA1PdFqZSg AsZL56p9ziD2IPzWRFxGHtlTOgLgr+nhVPnf3d50LaUryMc+NPFhpKcJUzTw78rCnZ2i lXfP0dHQdvBWdl3LcWnkKtcvtMwycRNjbZndDgNg5rQ0BMl3BWn5jhfm5aVMuMLQv3Y+ tk2AJp+nXig3HYvr0Vpd2TywEw1BJqK+OoPNDqfUCN9/sfGj58nRFc+BUwQ6PqKQFDAx 2heaYKUD4Z50pP7XjAsSgF2fLfes8IkaTnkDwK5/Ph+YDRlMOvo7/BiCttpp3Fdjt19T IhPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g31si6548621edg.206.2019.11.15.08.07.11; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:07:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727626AbfKOQDX (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:03:23 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59696 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727423AbfKOQDX (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:03:23 -0500 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41D06206D4; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:03:20 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: "Frank A. Cancio Bello" Cc: Joel Fernandes , Ingo Molnar , Jonathan Corbet , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] docs: ftrace: Clarify the RAM impact of buffer_size_kb Message-ID: <20191115110320.55b3d9cb@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20191115155955.4khvnlnzjhnp5bxa@ubuntu1804-desktop> References: <0e4a803c3e24140172855748b4a275c31920e208.1573661658.git.frank@generalsoftwareinc.com> <20191113113730.213ddd72@gandalf.local.home> <20191114202059.GC186056@google.com> <20191114163639.4727e3ed@gandalf.local.home> <20191115042428.6xxiqbzhgoko6vyk@ubuntu1804-desktop> <20191115083000.76f89785@gandalf.local.home> <20191115155955.4khvnlnzjhnp5bxa@ubuntu1804-desktop> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:59:55 -0500 "Frank A. Cancio Bello" wrote: > I feel that adding: > > "A few extra pages may be allocated to accommodate buffer management > meta-data." > > between the two sentences that I quoted will address the issue. If > that is OK with you I will proceed to package this change in a new > patchset along with a few fixes of typos that I spotted in other > parts of the doc. Yep, I'm OK with that. Thanks! -- Steve