Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org A93D660264
Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:20:50 -0700
From:   Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc:     swboyd@chromium.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
        bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, evgreen@chromium.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        mkshah@codeaurora.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        agross@kernel.org, dianders@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Support wakeup capable GPIOs
Message-ID: <20191115162050.GE18786@codeaurora.org>
References: <1573756521-27373-1-git-send-email-ilina@codeaurora.org>
 <54da99976d9bd2d543d2341ad9eb982e@www.loen.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54da99976d9bd2d543d2341ad9eb982e@www.loen.fr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 15 2019 at 03:36 -0700, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>Hi Lina,
>
>On 2019-11-14 18:35, Lina Iyer wrote:
>>Hi all,
>>
>>Thanks for all the reviews.
>>
>>Here is the next spin of the wakeup capable GPIO support. In order to
>>facilitate basic support available in the kernel, I have dropped the
>>SPI
>>register configuration. The feature was added when this series was
>>restarted based on new hierarchy support in gpiolib. But, the SPI
>>configuration can be done in the firmware. This would avoid a whole
>>lot
>>of code in linux that serve little to no purpose. Users of GPIO never
>>have the need to change the trigger type (level edge and vice-versa)
>>and
>>the basic configuration can be set in the firmware before boot.
>>
>>Changes in v1:
>>	- Address review comments
>>	- Add Reviewed-by tags
>>	- Drop SPI config patches
>>	- Rebase on top of Rajendra's PDC changes [6]
>>
>>Changes in RFC v2[5]:
>>        - Address review comments #3, #4, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10
>>        - Rebased on top of linux-next GPIO latest patches
>>[1],[3],[4]
>>        - Increase PDC max irqs in #2 (avoid merge conflicts with
>>          downstream)
>>        - Add Reviewed-by #5
>>
>>Please consider reviewing these patches.
>
>It has been a long time coming, and I'm minded to take the first 9
>patches into the irqchip tree. Anyone objects? The last 3 patches
>can go via the platform maintainer tree.
>
Sounds good Marc.

Thanks,
Lina