Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp4688516ybc; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:31:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqztSDGL3llxMATIZ0yznhvQN5oi3UjjLRyouj/6LYnIXAvmpuxwHVmmHHaOKyJgz6CyDYHJ X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b1c3:: with SMTP id a186mr16037457wmf.10.1573835504819; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:31:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573835504; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=js+6NmtmL7I0K5R4PZszFWSW0dGFzqbCDPUf8Z5Rl24mF2GNhzZhbDvAWhyanq+Qbc TBVz+ZsbIVoEOOT6gTZ3RSEKdftA0OL0kIVk4fk3N1SgTzqQhzvbKeCwQNQL0PtmUBBN i4bPh5+1qU1L8WyKg/CQgOiqrdqD0oNhtw8LlAh7HxjgBPFpq1l4RlfxMydo6o6tS/9f OSFSZFuRHT+tUQbx2P7TrVz6goFAyRBKn/4ffGQmrtNkPRisXnXd+w928GehVnvoS5Hd LiwBrI5OKpILNL/+2DaL82bCB7CrTwvU1xf1yKW2Fdt5eiPrASqJboHtdLmyflbu6RQz 8ucQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=HEkY+qobhUxRCKhtkuUSE9NaQZipRvL6B+6wR3NooqM=; b=AXmYgX3QnzqHChXjBEP6Mbl1rbrgeXdxnaP9iu39NlXjjaZOXLdog3CBFWADXQlJOf U6+kZ3b+LkB2CcQMYYKZnyQGdB2oLb/YnUomLuxr2kqS6Auv9FCFA9zlKnoxYJcDqhv9 Zvuva/7eKkmYC6uVUSDs7eahfgQ9uV8vg1tePM38qqnuRTqv0EVqdqvjlFB1jMjOezqX Cgb4FHxTgTMQ+hF/x/+UBCCR1COEydoE2nvn8SXGAce9fWzh9KBdwT7oP77z29OGNUXZ ZxbycfIvzWZluZtkzQQxhPakc42Y2ZOWI24DbJ1RXXwRpoPuo6apdu8sx63kCYK8tcbW /pPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j6si6562701eds.64.2019.11.15.08.31.20; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:31:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727746AbfKOQ3s (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:29:48 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:43402 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727721AbfKOQ3q (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:29:46 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E9582D8; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:29:43 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Eugeniu Rosca Cc: Joe Perches , Andy Whitcroft , , Eugeniu Rosca , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: whitelist Originally-by: signature Message-ID: <20191115092943.7c79f81e@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20191115154627.GA2187@lxhi-065.adit-jv.com> References: <20191115150202.15208-1-erosca@de.adit-jv.com> <05ba4e29fb78885cf9abf7bfc87e0a7bcda099fe.camel@perches.com> <20191115154627.GA2187@lxhi-065.adit-jv.com> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 16:46:27 +0100 Eugeniu Rosca wrote: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 07:09:17AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-11-15 at 16:02 +0100, Eugeniu Rosca wrote: > > > Oftentimes [1], the contributor would like to honor or give credits [2] > > > to somebody's original ideas in the submission/reviewing process. While > > > "Co-developed-by:" and "Suggested-by:" (currently whitelisted) could be > > > employed for this purpose, they are not ideal. > > > > You need to get the use of this accepted into Documentation/process > > before adding it to checkpatch > > If the change [*] makes sense to you, I can submit an update to > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst So there appear to be 89 patches with Originally-by in the entire Git history, which isn't a a lot; there are 3x as many Co-developed-by tags, which still isn't a huge number. I do wonder if it's worth recognizing yet another tag with a subtly different shade of meaning here? My own opinion doesn't matter a lot, but I'd like to have a sense that there is wider acceptance of this tag before adding it to the docs. Thanks, jon