Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp4767438ybc; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:44:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyfAP/VZ1sB3IvqGg89xSlc9eLBvM+rx0mPb/emrPgPWpXHg6I1DDDQOFM2XBeoJfKJ3mtS X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3e90:: with SMTP id a16mr2443820ejj.265.1573839877483; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:44:37 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1573839877; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Gui5HOfeuL1+dhAQgNUYzp8ju+UZS9tlfsYJ9Xz+yWqE0Ryn09EQvZQ53dRhXKujs2 Gcne96uoY4Y8EemUmYlyMBdIG2DX7CENNyqAeTYUqgtaFv0a4sImS886P6+s/jUxZPXa iyT95gyvd/9WuhQPvRA+ddUEK+0FCL+gzWzJeIdrl8Sv51vscJd3ZuuTAkvaVWHISql0 ErFACzpnHvjqeHxQvf1AXraMkJYKfop5EQ1mbMI9ME01DpLNGIF3B/+1sSEmVgM/CQbA zf9b21IMPtMOfoGE6rwOxjgbkiImm6LbTeyHeq9QlOldAYDUBX2PEGStyRxvcZdCQsbb JuFw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=3GX7iutP2V7ajaVifJYg96BfyX29t7cfofO0aP5hMT0=; b=MxFgUOkw71+4tkFXGfCA8EH2iDVgbvaBJEEp7ce+zQySFkGDAfo+uOpADGp/ilgOpz A5eGrkT0Zbu2QEYS7sW691YrBUIG5gt+lRC7V/00JSmpT/TTqJrXMl4ECJqEHJkVU3ib SDN/wRhFbGCNl242MCDpI1UV1/npM1iC5X4JWAALdiUD0gWtdzwyc/uONHyrhJNWP6CL XNjGC7Bz1IBwtTgFKQrs5YsVEvwKTj15YwEdN8kdg8sR9BEXzijmnVPcZIoq3gmm5DBD g42xEN8E3VnWQ54O1Nk7ExQioxbb+Rjbg11guPXlawQK4Fyk3HSrnPK1s3qstSv1InU0 VDjw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f11si6061876ejr.10.2019.11.15.09.44.12; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:44:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726996AbfKORkf (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:40:35 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:57502 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726920AbfKORke (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 12:40:34 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C8069CD8; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 18:40:31 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Tejun Heo Cc: Roman Gushchin , Michal =?iso-8859-1?Q?Koutn=FD?= , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kernel Team , "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: memcg: switch to css_tryget() in get_mem_cgroup_from_mm() Message-ID: <20191115174031.GA15216@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20191106225131.3543616-1-guro@fb.com> <20191113162934.GF19372@blackbody.suse.cz> <20191113170823.GA12464@castle.DHCP.thefacebook.com> <20191114191657.GN20866@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191114192018.GJ4163745@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> <20191114193340.GA24848@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191114193736.GL4163745@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191114193736.GL4163745@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 14-11-19 11:37:36, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 08:33:40PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > It is useful for controlling admissions of new userspace visible uses > > > - e.g. a tracepoint shouldn't be allowed to be attached to a cgroup > > > which has already been deleted. > > > > I am not sure I understand. Roman says that the cgroup can get offline > > right after the function returns. How is "already deleted" different > > from "just deleted"? I thought that the state is preserved at least > > while the rcu lock is held but my memory is dim here. > > It's the same difference as between "opening a file and deleting it" > and "deleting a file and opening it". I am sorry but I do not follow. How can css_tryget_online provide the same semantic when the css can go offline right after the tryget call returns so it is effectivelly undistinguishable from the case when the css was already online before the call was made. Or is my understanding of what Roman's said earlier in the thread? -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs