Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <fd1a028bf2a5f9141b3a25459fa21b4083c58705.camel@9elements.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] firmware: google: Release devices before
 unregistering the bus
From:   patrick.rudolph@9elements.com
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@intel.com>,
        Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Date:   Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:12:24 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20191116133849.GC454551@kroah.com>
References: <20191115134842.17013-1-patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
         <20191115134842.17013-2-patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
         <20191116133849.GC454551@kroah.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4 (3.32.4-1.fc30) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 2019-11-16 at 14:38 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 02:48:37PM +0100, 
> patrick.rudolph@9elements.com wrote:
> > From: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
> > 
> > Fix a bug where the kernel module can't be loaded after it has been
> > unloaded as the devices are still present and conflicting with the
> > to be created coreboot devices.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/firmware/google/coreboot_table.c | 6 ++++++
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/google/coreboot_table.c
> > b/drivers/firmware/google/coreboot_table.c
> > index 8d132e4f008a..88c6545bebf4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/google/coreboot_table.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/google/coreboot_table.c
> > @@ -163,8 +163,14 @@ static int coreboot_table_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int __cb_dev_unregister(struct device *dev, void *dummy)
> > +{
> > +	device_unregister(dev);
> 
> Did you build this patch???
> 
> Did it work when you tested it?  How?
> 
It builds without a warning and is working.

It looks like there's no -Werror=return-type in the kernel's Makefile,
which is kind of odd as this is kind of undefined behaviour in C...

Will fix.

> Please fix up,
> 
> greg k-h