Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 18 Nov 2019 12:11:43 +0100
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 028/237] Btrfs: fix alignment in declaration
 and prototype of btrfs_get_extent
Message-ID: <20191118111143.GE3001@twin.jikos.cz>
Reply-To: dsterba@suse.cz
Mail-Followup-To: dsterba@suse.cz, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
        linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
References: <20191116154113.7417-1-sashal@kernel.org>
 <20191116154113.7417-28-sashal@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191116154113.7417-28-sashal@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 10:37:43AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
> 
> [ Upstream commit de2c6615dcddf2af868c5cbd1db2e9e73b4beb58 ]
> 
> This fixes btrfs_get_extent to be consistent with our existing
> declaration style.

The patch is pure white space fix with no effects. I don't see that it
would be needed for a followup patch. What was the reason to add it to
autosel/stable ?