Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp2987321ybc; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:48:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwvSs6vUGqkmuq5QRQNCxPd3KMscbIWH2LyVdFM1QWruHuWHFSLaMNvy6fymv4A6yyyfsYH X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f317:: with SMTP id q23mr28879025wmq.97.1574092105011; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:48:25 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574092104; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dzUSF06RgHWtLbdU+WOpcdb00sCwAY1QB3Lp8IkEvSh6U4TS0gcb0sabt2KkKjCOww hgTXeLlcBW4QNTR7X6JqU9pwXzH5vZhuzE2H/FeScviOx1B6X8prpwdUPd3K7FDe2nr5 Ww0ca9pNIqzzvvbNww97i1Yb3F7PVYZqx2aSfZjpZx1fXYi+GHoU1t8AJNQnYzQMVl1i ZrBfSqDxff7dtxlBK3VLKVq1CI99ZaM/yCxbxRLV2CxmcaclPwXjDMtlCk6GY5aBi8vz 53rRz6sceZgIAJjO/BBry7/RQ2/tC4NvGGcn+SxOk4Oq0ufA/8RbYNlagLjCS3Vm/0Ad CH+Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=2tb55j5TSDIP+bSFfHpsJZ/LAmKYJfM8t8kMzq4jMuc=; b=oBoNrq8hK24qY/c4phgLfSE01R+Fo4Wsx9Sv42g9G4xh2AXGNkt0I6revCqv6qcLHT NhWAqGEiFzErFjAZOkaoZd2Ra/d/ZmpY4ig5h5/kHLZidpmELUBcaDywzJ9E2rMkN41l iGDQ3ULzxJTFfHVtqHnIZwGJnSzG2+s+PYzMPV1N9Pu7TzB0iWHd/rp5ddZ2hLblO3Py dioycazyFcf3JbHE8gM7gCE+GPbA5n9WFR8Dl/xh9BND4PvomMgFlRESh36+BnueJX9s C8xPNh3YWkJFnbE2jTlRRtdsqXL3eBbiWfxKdOuwHhy2ifM5H6YbEsMsnKrVZQMZUcaH eaGg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o28si13545199edc.353.2019.11.18.07.48.01; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:48:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727494AbfKRPpx (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:45:53 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53646 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727336AbfKRPpv (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Nov 2019 10:45:51 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C99DAD33; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:45:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 07:41:31 -0800 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: mingo@kernel.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v2 0/4] x86,mm/pat: Move towards using generic interval tree Message-ID: <20191118154131.4vvqa3azfneakxrm@linux-p48b> References: <20191021231924.25373-1-dave@stgolabs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191021231924.25373-1-dave@stgolabs.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ping? With another week of rc, can this still make it for v5.5? Thanks, Davidlohr On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: >Changes from v1[0]: > - Got rid of more code in patch 1 by using the end - 1 for closed > intervals, instead of keeping the overlap-check. > > - added an additional cleanup patch. > >Hi, > >I'm sending this series again in this format as the interval tree >node conversion will, at a minimum, take longer than hoped for >(ie: Jason still removing interval tree users for the mmu_notifier >rework[1]). There is also a chance this will never see be done. > >As such, I'm resending this series (where patch 1 is the only >interesting one and which Ingo acked previously, with the exception >that the nodes remain fully closed). In the future, it would be >trivial to port pat tree to semi open nodes, but for now think that >it makes sense to just get the pat changes in. > >Please consider for v5.5. Thanks! > >[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190813224620.31005-1-dave@stgolabs.net/ >[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=157116340411211 > >Davidlohr Bueso (4): > x86/mm, pat: Convert pat tree to generic interval tree > x86,mm/pat: Cleanup some of the local memtype_rb_* calls > x86,mm/pat: Drop rbt suffix from external memtype calls > x86/mm, pat: Rename pat_rbtree.c to pat_interval.c > > arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 8 +- > arch/x86/mm/pat_internal.h | 20 ++-- > arch/x86/mm/pat_interval.c | 186 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c | 268 --------------------------------------------- > 4 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 282 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 arch/x86/mm/pat_interval.c > delete mode 100644 arch/x86/mm/pat_rbtree.c > >-- >2.16.4 >