Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp3231743ybc; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:42:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwglrUQCpSzsn1DgqT8Fzc6GSIybrGtadQrncAmaBA8sWDRXzVrO0LU5v7kP+AYcBK79zOD X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4dda:: with SMTP id f26mr28987994ejw.89.1574106154422; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:42:34 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574106154; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yffU44e71vSAd5+gIKHlW6uC4yXx3+Xtk+aatr2bSucCAh9lAz5U6g01mXaeK7GfmM WMbOFqfvKGcADm1zhFeFzjYDNKpiWOl7Z5l8Ghu7nTrKyLlzgOAaefihvq0FejLgLcrA Aqg29UVvWxHUHcqrIgNv+kBXewICatUYj8f0fIYxMeQvzX/7NzZxJ87gMwhFsjTjS/42 89gQX77J7qGI3PqlyM7IyoVZajFWC4MlJgdIo0K1cVloRhLdJVH60qtBSbYqDDAxHdDg ZWHk54C5MUoh+8DyQVh6TLyEKbnmHfXgxxaG3CFNZTIZd/wi9//I0oQq1bnhoOGA1vJH MMZw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from; bh=cMKMhN53TYCqf5bAVSTcHRi7fSyz71gztV7bFwxLSv0=; b=y5RVQ+nafY+eFD8e5qxf4iWVY0+qzL65QCmCwDVR2s0kPCCFTEe3WfEx9R+9TT3JLB e5W03QGuFTQeTwaHqCspCifEDDgqEEzKcEFThofcGJ6WMdWAMyzZakeKVJh5iK9cBF0R uwc6n4wXNYwSysPJTnUJyiM7/YMjEgZud9zh4N2q4jlWdOYnyJ5CR7vsCKMDOUKZYzE/ 59MdsXMlMEEJ7l+0RfDxV/OoXs74oPAuvDgxf6wZRQ5bbN0zVYXFE56+0Nh2a80/LLoC RqMdEiZ+9vE8OKYPX5yKkiDezuE0jNd3UOco5bGxwUwvOZVUCYMR5j+XH0IRgr8hPS1W KRBw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o12si12885677edv.43.2019.11.18.11.42.10; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:42:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727036AbfKRTiQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 18 Nov 2019 14:38:16 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:60271 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726869AbfKRTiB (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Nov 2019 14:38:01 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Nov 2019 11:37:59 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,321,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="380760875" Received: from jacob-builder.jf.intel.com ([10.7.199.155]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Nov 2019 11:37:59 -0800 From: Jacob Pan To: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, LKML , Joerg Roedel , "Lu Baolu" , David Woodhouse Cc: "Tian, Kevin" , Raj Ashok , "Yi Liu" , Eric Auger , Jacob Pan Subject: [PATCH v2 10/10] iommu/vt-d: Misc macro clean up for SVM Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 11:42:33 -0800 Message-Id: <1574106153-45867-11-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1574106153-45867-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> References: <1574106153-45867-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Use combined macros for_each_svm_dev() to simplify SVM device iteration and error checking. Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan Reviewed-by: Eric Auger Acked-by: Lu Baolu --- drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c index 098c89246593..9fe183376a20 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c @@ -226,6 +226,10 @@ static const struct mmu_notifier_ops intel_mmuops = { static DEFINE_MUTEX(pasid_mutex); static LIST_HEAD(global_svm_list); +#define for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, d) \ + list_for_each_entry((sdev), &(svm)->devs, list) \ + if ((d) != (sdev)->dev) {} else + int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int *pasid, int flags, struct svm_dev_ops *ops) { struct intel_iommu *iommu = intel_svm_device_to_iommu(dev); @@ -274,15 +278,13 @@ int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int *pasid, int flags, struct svm_dev_ goto out; } - list_for_each_entry(sdev, &svm->devs, list) { - if (dev == sdev->dev) { - if (sdev->ops != ops) { - ret = -EBUSY; - goto out; - } - sdev->users++; - goto success; + for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, dev) { + if (sdev->ops != ops) { + ret = -EBUSY; + goto out; } + sdev->users++; + goto success; } break; @@ -427,45 +429,38 @@ int intel_svm_unbind_mm(struct device *dev, int pasid) goto out; } - if (!svm) - goto out; - - list_for_each_entry(sdev, &svm->devs, list) { - if (dev == sdev->dev) { - ret = 0; - sdev->users--; - if (!sdev->users) { - list_del_rcu(&sdev->list); - /* Flush the PASID cache and IOTLB for this device. - * Note that we do depend on the hardware *not* using - * the PASID any more. Just as we depend on other - * devices never using PASIDs that they have no right - * to use. We have a *shared* PASID table, because it's - * large and has to be physically contiguous. So it's - * hard to be as defensive as we might like. */ - intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(iommu, dev, svm->pasid); - intel_flush_svm_range_dev(svm, sdev, 0, -1, 0); - kfree_rcu(sdev, rcu); - - if (list_empty(&svm->devs)) { - /* Clear private data so that free pass check */ - ioasid_set_data(svm->pasid, NULL); - ioasid_free(svm->pasid); - if (svm->mm) - mmu_notifier_unregister(&svm->notifier, svm->mm); - - list_del(&svm->list); - - /* We mandate that no page faults may be outstanding - * for the PASID when intel_svm_unbind_mm() is called. - * If that is not obeyed, subtle errors will happen. - * Let's make them less subtle... */ - memset(svm, 0x6b, sizeof(*svm)); - kfree(svm); - } + for_each_svm_dev(sdev, svm, dev) { + ret = 0; + sdev->users--; + if (!sdev->users) { + list_del_rcu(&sdev->list); + /* Flush the PASID cache and IOTLB for this device. + * Note that we do depend on the hardware *not* using + * the PASID any more. Just as we depend on other + * devices never using PASIDs that they have no right + * to use. We have a *shared* PASID table, because it's + * large and has to be physically contiguous. So it's + * hard to be as defensive as we might like. */ + intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(iommu, dev, svm->pasid); + intel_flush_svm_range_dev(svm, sdev, 0, -1, 0); + kfree_rcu(sdev, rcu); + + if (list_empty(&svm->devs)) { + /* Clear private data so that free pass check */ + ioasid_set_data(svm->pasid, NULL); + ioasid_free(svm->pasid); + if (svm->mm) + mmu_notifier_unregister(&svm->notifier, svm->mm); + list_del(&svm->list); + /* We mandate that no page faults may be outstanding + * for the PASID when intel_svm_unbind_mm() is called. + * If that is not obeyed, subtle errors will happen. + * Let's make them less subtle... */ + memset(svm, 0x6b, sizeof(*svm)); + kfree(svm); } - break; } + break; } out: mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex); -- 2.7.4