Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750803AbWAOTMi (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:12:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750799AbWAOTMi (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:12:38 -0500 Received: from flock1.newmail.ru ([212.48.140.157]:56542 "HELO flock1.newmail.ru") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750803AbWAOTMi (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:12:38 -0500 From: Andrey Borzenkov To: Jean Delvare Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 2.6.15: lm90 0-004c: Register 0x13 read failed (-1) Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:12:30 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200601142223.35838.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> <20060114222032.1c2ff252.khali@linux-fr.org> <200601150045.30942.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> In-Reply-To: <200601150045.30942.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601152212.31491.arvidjaar@newmail.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3755 Lines: 92 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 15 January 2006 00:45, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > On Sunday 15 January 2006 00:20, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi Andrey, > > > > > Vanilla 2.6.15 on Toshiba Portege 4000. I get constant messages in > > > dmesg: > > > > > > i2c_adapter i2c-0: Error: command never completed > > > lm90 0-004c: Register 0x1 read failed (-1) > > > i2c_adapter i2c-0: Error: command never completed > > > lm90 0-004c: Register 0x14 read failed (-1) > > > i2c_adapter i2c-0: Error: command never completed > > > lm90 0-004c: Register 0x8 read failed (-1) > > > i2c_adapter i2c-0: Error: command never completed > > > lm90 0-004c: Register 0x0 read failed (-1) > > > > > > for quite a number of registers. Apparently I can read sensors just > > > fine still I am uneasy seeing those. > > > > Before 2.6.15, the lm90 driver did not handle read errors in any way, > > so they were probably already there, you simply were not aware of it. > > However, I guess that you already had the "command never completed" > > errors? These come from the i2c-ali1535 bus driver. > > Before 2.6.15 I run Mandriva kernel 2.6.12-12mdk. I do not remember them > but may be I just never actually looked in dmesg :) > > > It would be possible to add a retry-on-failure mechanism in the lm90 > > driver. However, the real problem is more likely in the i2c-ali1535 > > driver so fixing this one driver would be preferable. > > > > > eeprom-i2c-0-50 > > > Adapter: SMBus ALI1535 adapter at ef00 > > > Memory type: SDR SDRAM DIMM > > > Memory size (MB): 256 > > > > > > adm1032-i2c-0-4c > > > Adapter: SMBus ALI1535 adapter at ef00 > > > M/B Temp: +43?C (low = -65?C, high = +127?C) > > > CPU Temp: +47.6?C (low = +43.0?C, high = +51.0?C) ALARM > > > M/B Crit: +127?C (hyst = +122?C) > > > CPU Crit: +100?C (hyst = +95?C) > > > > Do you also have "command never completed" errors without an associated > > error from the lm90 driver? > > yes, on boot. > > > This would suggest that the eeprom driver > > too is triggering errors, which in turn would confirm that we need to > > fix the i2c-ali1535 driver rather than adding a workaround to the lm90 > > driver. > > > > It looks like the i2c-ali1535 driver as it exists in the lm_sensors CVS > > repository (for Linux 2.4 kernels) did receive a major change in March > > 2005. These changes were supposed to "fix stability problems" (by > > adding delay loops pretty much everywhere). They were never ported to > > the Linux 2.6 version of the driver. Maybe we should try doing so now. > > > > This is a 400 lines patch, porting it won't be trivial, I am not > > familiar with this driver myself and I don't have a chip to test my > > changes on, so if someone else wants to take his/her chance, go. If > > not, I'll do it. > > > > Andrey, will you be able to test a i2c-ali1535 patch if we come up with > > one? > > Yes. Send me a patch (or give a link) and I'll try what I can do to port > it. I ask if I have a question :) > Do you mean revision 1.21 with date: 2005/03/27 02:22:10; author: mds? I checked and this one seems to be in current 2.6.15.1 kernel. I did not check if there were any omissions comparing with CVS but current kernel does contain and use ali1535_transaction() added by mentioned patch. - -andrey -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDyp6fR6LMutpd94wRAnqNAKCn3kW51rt3YrPatfVibeU1WPClvQCfTWAG u3RJ0TZnP3izDyPS1HwbVg0= =35MJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/