Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:43:53 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20191119014357.98465-1-brianvv@google.com>
Message-Id: <20191119014357.98465-6-brianvv@google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
References: <20191119014357.98465-1-brianvv@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 5/9] bpf: add batch ops to all htab bpf map
From:   Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>
To:     Brian Vazquez <brianvv.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc:     Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
        Petar Penkov <ppenkov@google.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        bpf@vger.kernel.org, Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>

htab can't use generic batch support due some problematic behaviours
inherent to the datastructre, i.e. while iterating the bpf map  a
concurrent program might delete the next entry that batch was about to
use, in this case there's no easy solution to retrieve the next entry
and the issua has been discussed multiple times (see [1] and [2]).
The only way hmap can be traversed without the problem previously
exposed is by making sure that the map is traversing entire buckets.
This commit implements those strict requirements for hmap, the
implementation follows the same interaction that generic support with
some exceptions:

 - If keys/values buffer are not big enough to traverse a bucket,
   ENOSPC will be returned.
 - out_batch contains the value of the next bucket in the iteration, not
 the next key, but this is transparent for the user since the user
 should never use out_batch for other than bpf batch syscalls.

Note that only lookup and lookup_and_delete batch ops require the hmap
specific implementation and update/delete batch ops can be the generic
ones.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20190724165803.87470-1-brianvv@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20190906225434.3635421-1-yhs@fb.com/

Co-authored-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 244 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 244 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
index 22066a62c8c97..3402174b292ea 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
@@ -17,6 +17,17 @@
 	(BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC | BPF_F_NO_COMMON_LRU | BPF_F_NUMA_NODE |	\
 	 BPF_F_ACCESS_MASK | BPF_F_ZERO_SEED)
 
+#define BATCH_OPS(_name)			\
+	.map_lookup_batch =			\
+	_name##_map_lookup_batch,		\
+	.map_lookup_and_delete_batch =		\
+	_name##_map_lookup_and_delete_batch,	\
+	.map_update_batch =			\
+	generic_map_update_batch,		\
+	.map_delete_batch =			\
+	generic_map_delete_batch
+
+
 struct bucket {
 	struct hlist_nulls_head head;
 	raw_spinlock_t lock;
@@ -1232,6 +1243,235 @@ static void htab_map_seq_show_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
+static int
+__htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
+				   const union bpf_attr *attr,
+				   union bpf_attr __user *uattr,
+				   bool do_delete, bool is_lru_map,
+				   bool is_percpu)
+{
+	struct bpf_htab *htab = container_of(map, struct bpf_htab, map);
+	u32 bucket_cnt, total, key_size, value_size, roundup_key_size;
+	void *keys = NULL, *values = NULL, *value, *dst_key, *dst_val;
+	void __user *ukeys, *uvalues, *ubatch;
+	u64 elem_map_flags, map_flags;
+	struct hlist_nulls_head *head;
+	struct hlist_nulls_node *n;
+	u32 batch, max_count, size;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	struct htab_elem *l;
+	struct bucket *b;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	max_count = attr->batch.count;
+	if (!max_count)
+		return 0;
+
+	elem_map_flags = attr->batch.elem_flags;
+	if ((elem_map_flags & ~BPF_F_LOCK) ||
+	    ((elem_map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK) && !map_value_has_spin_lock(map)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	map_flags = attr->batch.flags;
+	if (map_flags)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	batch = 0;
+	ubatch = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.in_batch);
+	if (ubatch && copy_from_user(&batch, ubatch, sizeof(batch)))
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (batch >= htab->n_buckets)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	/* We cannot do copy_from_user or copy_to_user inside
+	 * the rcu_read_lock. Allocate enough space here.
+	 */
+	key_size = htab->map.key_size;
+	roundup_key_size = round_up(htab->map.key_size, 8);
+	value_size = htab->map.value_size;
+	size = round_up(value_size, 8);
+	if (is_percpu)
+		value_size = size * num_possible_cpus();
+	keys = kvmalloc(key_size * max_count, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	values = kvmalloc(value_size * max_count, GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+	if (!keys || !values) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	dst_key = keys;
+	dst_val = values;
+	total = 0;
+
+	preempt_disable();
+	this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active);
+	rcu_read_lock();
+
+again:
+	b = &htab->buckets[batch];
+	head = &b->head;
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&b->lock, flags);
+
+	bucket_cnt = 0;
+	hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(l, n, head, hash_node)
+		bucket_cnt++;
+
+	if (bucket_cnt > (max_count - total)) {
+		if (total == 0)
+			ret = -ENOSPC;
+		goto after_loop;
+	}
+
+	hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(l, n, head, hash_node) {
+		memcpy(dst_key, l->key, key_size);
+
+		if (is_percpu) {
+			int off = 0, cpu;
+			void __percpu *pptr;
+
+			pptr = htab_elem_get_ptr(l, map->key_size);
+			for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+				bpf_long_memcpy(dst_val + off,
+						per_cpu_ptr(pptr, cpu), size);
+				off += size;
+			}
+		} else {
+			value = l->key + roundup_key_size;
+			if (elem_map_flags & BPF_F_LOCK)
+				copy_map_value_locked(map, dst_val, value,
+						      true);
+			else
+				copy_map_value(map, dst_val, value);
+			check_and_init_map_lock(map, dst_val);
+		}
+		dst_key += key_size;
+		dst_val += value_size;
+		total++;
+	}
+
+	if (do_delete) {
+		hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_rcu(l, n, head, hash_node) {
+			hlist_nulls_del_rcu(&l->hash_node);
+			if (is_lru_map)
+				bpf_lru_push_free(&htab->lru, &l->lru_node);
+			else
+				free_htab_elem(htab, l);
+		}
+	}
+
+	batch++;
+	if (batch >= htab->n_buckets) {
+		ret = -ENOENT;
+		goto after_loop;
+	}
+
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
+	goto again;
+
+after_loop:
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->lock, flags);
+
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+	this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
+	preempt_enable();
+
+	if (ret && ret != -ENOENT)
+		goto out;
+
+	/* copy data back to user */
+	ukeys = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.keys);
+	uvalues = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.values);
+	ubatch = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->batch.out_batch);
+	if (copy_to_user(ubatch, &batch, sizeof(batch)) ||
+	    copy_to_user(ukeys, keys, total * key_size) ||
+	    copy_to_user(uvalues, values, total * value_size) ||
+	    put_user(total, &uattr->batch.count))
+		ret = -EFAULT;
+
+out:
+	kvfree(keys);
+	kvfree(values);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int
+htab_percpu_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map, const union bpf_attr *attr,
+			     union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
+{
+	return __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(map, attr, uattr, false,
+						  false, true);
+}
+
+static int
+htab_percpu_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
+					const union bpf_attr *attr,
+					union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
+{
+	return __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(map, attr, uattr, true,
+						  false, true);
+}
+
+static int
+htab_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map, const union bpf_attr *attr,
+		      union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
+{
+	return __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(map, attr, uattr, false,
+						  false, false);
+}
+
+static int
+htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
+				 const union bpf_attr *attr,
+				 union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
+{
+	return __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(map, attr, uattr, true,
+						  false, false);
+}
+
+static int
+htab_map_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
+		      const union bpf_attr *attr,
+		      union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
+{
+	return generic_map_delete_batch(map, attr, uattr);
+}
+
+static int
+htab_lru_percpu_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
+				 const union bpf_attr *attr,
+				 union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
+{
+	return __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(map, attr, uattr, false,
+						  true, true);
+}
+
+static int
+htab_lru_percpu_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
+					    const union bpf_attr *attr,
+					    union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
+{
+	return __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(map, attr, uattr, true,
+						  true, true);
+}
+
+static int
+htab_lru_map_lookup_batch(struct bpf_map *map, const union bpf_attr *attr,
+			  union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
+{
+	return __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(map, attr, uattr, false,
+						  true, false);
+}
+
+static int
+htab_lru_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
+				     const union bpf_attr *attr,
+				     union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
+{
+	return __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(map, attr, uattr, true,
+						  true, false);
+}
+
 const struct bpf_map_ops htab_map_ops = {
 	.map_alloc_check = htab_map_alloc_check,
 	.map_alloc = htab_map_alloc,
@@ -1242,6 +1482,7 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops htab_map_ops = {
 	.map_delete_elem = htab_map_delete_elem,
 	.map_gen_lookup = htab_map_gen_lookup,
 	.map_seq_show_elem = htab_map_seq_show_elem,
+	BATCH_OPS(htab),
 };
 
 const struct bpf_map_ops htab_lru_map_ops = {
@@ -1255,6 +1496,7 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops htab_lru_map_ops = {
 	.map_delete_elem = htab_lru_map_delete_elem,
 	.map_gen_lookup = htab_lru_map_gen_lookup,
 	.map_seq_show_elem = htab_map_seq_show_elem,
+	BATCH_OPS(htab_lru),
 };
 
 /* Called from eBPF program */
@@ -1368,6 +1610,7 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops htab_percpu_map_ops = {
 	.map_update_elem = htab_percpu_map_update_elem,
 	.map_delete_elem = htab_map_delete_elem,
 	.map_seq_show_elem = htab_percpu_map_seq_show_elem,
+	BATCH_OPS(htab_percpu),
 };
 
 const struct bpf_map_ops htab_lru_percpu_map_ops = {
@@ -1379,6 +1622,7 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops htab_lru_percpu_map_ops = {
 	.map_update_elem = htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem,
 	.map_delete_elem = htab_lru_map_delete_elem,
 	.map_seq_show_elem = htab_percpu_map_seq_show_elem,
+	BATCH_OPS(htab_lru_percpu),
 };
 
 static int fd_htab_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
-- 
2.24.0.432.g9d3f5f5b63-goog