Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp133823ybc; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:54:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwwC5PyEtBdbOSlKQCc1mIZvg2G8J8AjFMwgBKllAtSmXnOZlz0HPQYtNxoTgDNa4ObfmZe X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8606:: with SMTP id o6mr33411223ejx.202.1574142893080; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:54:53 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574142893; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=INbgTxLtLDxKBanNwv/AX4QKzbZcWUaJ+kKAiKnoCB6ahkGsIibJlAqif1RWWR/hpX dUvxPOOKTFgOxEcvYPkbDq5QmJFtaxtRjljD9BcWZFcs99xPIvbUMq12h6FxTzypSvvW GiXZd0KiZ88Omf6UnUUSFNMBjFcTFxQHr28CN8hgQxeJd9JpcIOGilDgTuerkT6Uull3 Dtus3tQ7IP131OX2zVOobUfWps/Xae1nKj28EOP4WZWsXVgunHtPO8YrRUeSEs4jsdTU 1P04mXHf5OKPLCF2rhAlFlCLa3dtk8LaqByj1wzqTp9lRYTQBFZjCiGb/lzxWdUHiBpa FbLw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to :from:dkim-signature; bh=tJxZdYFgPaFGjFnmmQzNiJ0H2uO3O/Ivz+G5GatMM9g=; b=kZ7XygjcvW7/bL7UMNKefUKaTHMcWKlfuvIThd7ol1ZnGDe/eneygFX44nyAT9FBs5 BuiSv8EZgesDu3gn9T8/muGms0iwo8cZmkXnR97YhZ8WayQcFiZeCn7AYq1uJ47+XLc7 iDQT/YTgQhgyuZqP3CNDn+y8DsvtFZe+9zS7MY0cMzwTEdBiRiyJedLciFmBRqdaMTPP TPPFDVDxAv9XIQVMneG696GUy6wnF6zQHD4FZ8Z4Sga0wmVySIHJBPjtgWtibrlus3wE 1d3g8F3KnhWanBykzbzpDfFCkYjcqmr7QB6127IM7VDwtR0k5rgjm1km4aiCT/MzE9hu OlKA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=mmlmlRkv; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gw9si13150273ejb.284.2019.11.18.21.54.28; Mon, 18 Nov 2019 21:54:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=mmlmlRkv; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731987AbfKSFxK (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:53:10 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51024 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731978AbfKSFxJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 00:53:09 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA5A0208C3; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 05:53:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1574142788; bh=UwLXFne5zF+yoIN2n+oORAiSDjx98eG7FobzA3nIJFA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mmlmlRkvSic02u7Rm+h+an/q9XdsxAeaM9GUGpdUp6ne579gdegMUBvXpNz4av2OS PlVNKMIc7/MQUchIU7ssF5BJvQH8OHXD5gp32GOHikIc594v4NstJPuUYOlRArljDI XGR6Cx/fm4LBFVIiaLr9WtLzR5KOCs9VejMq48rk= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Gage Eads , Ashok Raj , Alex Williamson , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 199/239] vfio/pci: Mask buggy SR-IOV VF INTx support Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 06:19:59 +0100 Message-Id: <20191119051336.272393531@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.0 In-Reply-To: <20191119051255.850204959@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20191119051255.850204959@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Alex Williamson [ Upstream commit db04264fe9bc0f2b62e036629f9afb530324b693 ] The SR-IOV spec requires that VFs must report zero for the INTx pin register as VFs are precluded from INTx support. It's much easier for the host kernel to understand whether a device is a VF and therefore whether a non-zero pin register value is bogus than it is to do the same in userspace. Override the INTx count for such devices and virtualize the pin register to provide a consistent view of the device to the user. As this is clearly a spec violation, warn about it to support hardware validation, but also provide a known whitelist as it doesn't do much good to continue complaining if the hardware vendor doesn't plan to fix it. Known devices with this issue: 8086:270c Tested-by: Gage Eads Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 8 ++++++-- drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c index 15b1cd4ef5a77..9bd3e7911af2b 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c @@ -433,10 +433,14 @@ static int vfio_pci_get_irq_count(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev, int irq_type) { if (irq_type == VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX) { u8 pin; + + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_INTX) || + vdev->nointx || vdev->pdev->is_virtfn) + return 0; + pci_read_config_byte(vdev->pdev, PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, &pin); - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_INTX) && !vdev->nointx && pin) - return 1; + return pin ? 1 : 0; } else if (irq_type == VFIO_PCI_MSI_IRQ_INDEX) { u8 pos; u16 flags; diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c index 62023b4a373b4..423ea1f98441a 100644 --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c @@ -1611,6 +1611,15 @@ static int vfio_ecap_init(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) return 0; } +/* + * Nag about hardware bugs, hopefully to have vendors fix them, but at least + * to collect a list of dependencies for the VF INTx pin quirk below. + */ +static const struct pci_device_id known_bogus_vf_intx_pin[] = { + { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x270c) }, + {} +}; + /* * For each device we allocate a pci_config_map that indicates the * capability occupying each dword and thus the struct perm_bits we @@ -1676,6 +1685,24 @@ int vfio_config_init(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev) if (pdev->is_virtfn) { *(__le16 *)&vconfig[PCI_VENDOR_ID] = cpu_to_le16(pdev->vendor); *(__le16 *)&vconfig[PCI_DEVICE_ID] = cpu_to_le16(pdev->device); + + /* + * Per SR-IOV spec rev 1.1, 3.4.1.18 the interrupt pin register + * does not apply to VFs and VFs must implement this register + * as read-only with value zero. Userspace is not readily able + * to identify whether a device is a VF and thus that the pin + * definition on the device is bogus should it violate this + * requirement. We already virtualize the pin register for + * other purposes, so we simply need to replace the bogus value + * and consider VFs when we determine INTx IRQ count. + */ + if (vconfig[PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN] && + !pci_match_id(known_bogus_vf_intx_pin, pdev)) + pci_warn(pdev, + "Hardware bug: VF reports bogus INTx pin %d\n", + vconfig[PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN]); + + vconfig[PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN] = 0; /* Gratuitous for good VFs */ } if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_INTX) || vdev->nointx) -- 2.20.1