Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750735AbWAPMQQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:16:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750740AbWAPMQQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:16:16 -0500 Received: from ns.miraclelinux.com ([219.118.163.66]:18738 "EHLO mail01.miraclelinux.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750735AbWAPMQP (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:16:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:16:11 +0900 To: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/3] changes about Call Trace: Message-ID: <20060116121611.GA539@miraclelinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: mita@miraclelinux.com (Akinobu Mita) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1087 Lines: 30 Hello, I realized two things when I was porting my small script oops2line to x86-64. (read call trace, find correspondance modules, calculate addr and addr2line) If I'm missing something, please let me know. a) On x86-64 we get different Call Trace format than other architectures when we get oops or press SysRq-t: {:jbd:kjournald+1030} There is a architecture independent function print_symbol(). How about using it on x86-64? But it changes to: [] kjournald+0x406/0x578 [jbd] b) I can't find useful usage for the symbol size in print_symbol(). And symbolsize seems to be fixed when vmlinux or modules are compiled. So we can calculate it from vmlinux or modules. How about removing the field of symbolsize in print_symbol()? [] kjournald+0x406 [jbd] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/