Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp1223272ybc; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:50:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxJ7tVDabCA8t37HZmcqOdmvhXg7Kc6A186Ggt3kb4mAy00AMtMNrrlNaf1780A2K96epzh X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:bce5:: with SMTP id op5mr941909ejb.325.1574211023000; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:50:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574211022; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Vs82kL1WmOJ1gmvEuIP0VyEjU2ZJKcV+cqA0c2qyEfPYpfh61bzTuNivL3gks8P+6A Q/ZTdNBeEviuR8gPRIWoHdlWbsVVpwYrqnJFMwQh/TC/xHEhjv4QTg2aUUSBLA34WKXb knEORbN70XE1lu/N9DQAKL6qMp5JaoDCTfvADQip0efxcJRB+IOcSHdc5R9tYKGLIHYs Wiu/U9rORqpDUUo8ilPAnDvqWxgsJFX9X2MdrM43eBzWcD/73DuNzZvIxsEJK0GSkBwu FfdGLMn9LV/BF8d/V2aGxt+k5qYllsqDQID7kqce0BkSiTELL8X/kh0N5DXYCkoOUKeH xGag== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=WEv7BRmBHSlSsUC75BTxkwrtEfreMq9HVVq2yw+WYGc=; b=GH5KdEkIjbeIxJf8YSw3Z487k1EEltvwJ/mciYgcjXlvKU2VtMFRUg+LtQZQRzSsg2 0WKwqBvODYncjahSzlWs6dwD8qyXItQt9Jyh+S/Tdy7TZ6VsvJSTsEAqqysR5Eu+e8ZK iUo8kPhYo8sZS/T9eKluhDMKzpNoTN7MCNqbpTKoizc1O8TtktPVng6Pib5y+F4b+8Va jCveEsZ4sFcEWlU8xL0oUrpf3IR1tBHxE/d5XmzPCbX4By+hwg+1nnnx0wixQTGM+y3y qIFEf2K3Qe17pXqTdeGn3MUUkrTRQ45E5xCCXqbbzkdqyD/PKI8tlOeq1nPldTBU7ACU 3lTw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f5si17371493edf.232.2019.11.19.16.49.56; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:50:22 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727395AbfKTAqb (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:46:31 -0500 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:37641 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727222AbfKTAqb (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 19:46:31 -0500 X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Nov 2019 16:46:30 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,220,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="237537741" Received: from richard.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.159.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2019 16:46:29 -0800 Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 08:46:20 +0800 From: Wei Yang To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Wei Yang , n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/memory-failure.c: PageHuge is handled at the beginning of memory_failure Message-ID: <20191120004620.GB11061@richard> Reply-To: Wei Yang References: <20191118082003.26240-1-richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> <1e61c115-5787-9ef4-a449-2e490c53fca7@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1e61c115-5787-9ef4-a449-2e490c53fca7@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:23:54PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: >On 18.11.19 09:20, Wei Yang wrote: >> PageHuge is handled by memory_failure_hugetlb(), so this case could be >> removed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang >> --- >> mm/memory-failure.c | 5 +---- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c >> index 3151c87dff73..392ac277b17d 100644 >> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c >> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c >> @@ -1359,10 +1359,7 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags) >> * page_remove_rmap() in try_to_unmap_one(). So to determine page status >> * correctly, we save a copy of the page flags at this time. >> */ >> - if (PageHuge(p)) >> - page_flags = hpage->flags; >> - else >> - page_flags = p->flags; >> + page_flags = p->flags; >> /* >> * unpoison always clear PG_hwpoison inside page lock >> > >I somewhat miss a proper explanation why this is safe to do. We access page >flags here, so why is it safe to refer to the ones of the sub-page? > Hi, David I think your comment is on this line: page_flags = p->flags; Maybe we need to use this: page_flags = hpage->flags; And use hpage in the following or even the whole function? While one thing interesting is not all "compound page" is PageCompound. For some sub-page, we can't get the correct head. This means we may just check on the sub-page. >-- > >Thanks, > >David / dhildenb -- Wei Yang Help you, Help me