Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
References: <20191120031622.88949-1-stephen@brennan.io> <20191120031622.88949-2-stephen@brennan.io>
User-agent: mu4e 1.2.0; emacs 26.1
From:   Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
To:     Stephen Brennan <stephen@brennan.io>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc:     stephen@brennan.io, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
        Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>,
        Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: rng: add BCM2711 RNG compatible
In-reply-to: <20191120031622.88949-2-stephen@brennan.io>
Date:   Wed, 20 Nov 2019 06:50:16 +0200
Message-ID: <87ftijgnhz.fsf@tarshish>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Stephen, Stefan,

On Wed, Nov 20 2019, Stephen Brennan wrote:

> From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>
>
> The BCM2711 has a RNG200 block, so document its compatible string.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@gmx.net>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Brennan <stephen@brennan.io>

Isn't that duplicate of Florian's commit 6223949a1531?

> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt
> index c223e54452da..802523196ee5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/rng/brcm,iproc-rng200.txt
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ HWRNG support for the iproc-rng200 driver
>  
>  Required properties:
>  - compatible : Must be one of:
> +	       "brcm,bcm2711-rng200"
>  	       "brcm,bcm7211-rng200"

Isn't this clear text duplication? Am I missing something obvious?

I was looking at versions of this patch series wondering why no one
noticed that.

baruch

>  	       "brcm,bcm7278-rng200"
>  	       "brcm,iproc-rng200"

-- 
     http://baruch.siach.name/blog/                  ~. .~   Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
   - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -