Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:25:44 +0200
From:   Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To:     Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
Cc:     maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
        sean@poorly.run, airlied@linux.ie, daniel@ffwll.ch,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/rect: remove useless call to clamp_t
Message-ID: <20191120162544.GH1208@intel.com>
References: <20191119133435.22525-1-benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
 <20191120152234.GG1208@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20191120152234.GG1208@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 05:22:34PM +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 02:34:35PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> > Clamping a value between INT_MIN and INT_MAX always return the value itself
> > and generate warnings when compiling with W=1.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
> > index b8363aaa9032..681f1fd09357 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
> > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
> >  		u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src),
> >  					    drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
> 
> Hmm. I think we borked this a bit when introducing clip_scaled().
> 'diff' can exceed dst width here so clip_scaled() should be able to
> return a negative value.
> 
> Probably we should make this more consistent and do something like:
>         diff = clip->x1 - dst->x1;
>         if (diff > 0) {
> -               u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src),
> -                                           drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
> +               int dst_w, new_src_w;
>  
> -               src->x1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x2 - new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> -               dst->x1 = clip->x1;
> +               dst_w = drm_rect_width(dst);
> +               diff = min(diff, dst_w);
> +               new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src), dst_w, diff);
> +
> +               src->x1 = src->x2 - new_src_w;
> +               dst->x1 += diff;
>         }
> 
> etc.

I tried to refine that a bit more and sent it out as two patches.

> 
> >  
> > -		src->x1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x2 - new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> > +		src->x1 = src->x2 - new_src_w;
> >  		dst->x1 = clip->x1;
> >  	}
> >  	diff = clip->y1 - dst->y1;
> > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
> >  		u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src),
> >  					    drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
> >  
> > -		src->y1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y2 - new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> > +		src->y1 = src->y2 - new_src_h;
> >  		dst->y1 = clip->y1;
> >  	}
> >  	diff = dst->x2 - clip->x2;
> > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
> >  		u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src),
> >  					    drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
> >  
> > -		src->x2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x1 + new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> > +		src->x2 = src->x1 + new_src_w;
> >  		dst->x2 = clip->x2;
> >  	}
> >  	diff = dst->y2 - clip->y2;
> > @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst,
> >  		u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src),
> >  					    drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
> >  
> > -		src->y2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y1 + new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
> > +		src->y2 = src->y1 + new_src_h;
> >  		dst->y2 = clip->y2;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.15.0
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrj?l?
> Intel

-- 
Ville Syrj?l?
Intel