Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp2175436ybc; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:00:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwgTMobmsICeVNvTSu1kbFgl84I8O5lLlqk1S8eSd60yfoDm9tFt4HGmRqBhT1UKFHnR6YU X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e297:: with SMTP id gg23mr7031641ejb.41.1574272811612; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:00:11 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574272811; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dPiv8g7OOjFMcs8sdYbYiPJfzEZLUVeiHxU2MLIytoowdtsP2vsb47j046to4S9dcD W3pt2ZMR12CpRgLZZ/E8tmVP9RmmfZR1emNschJMpwvFBbYpZjLpDdJlQPEu8XXqP1c5 qbQAX0moh+OWtflbijkS4h07s3rP9HhevxRhfDtIhLA24ExFNsKeNtP1MVRuF2+e6Os4 4wiLGiWNKdhtTL4sFB0row34zzhC9n6tsoxIJGLrOj3xZ2B23CERAOy+1gw6OPv8uSA2 /8xZEsMif0rBFazCAKZP4fI+iDRJ1m+/dPdNOERNRdAD2YvTJPnwcrxWqZT54qv8YcHP 0yXw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=l86Fwc46knizcJSg5MOszekpx3WvOkVEkjU/8FQVoJw=; b=tkvnBnVKbVVadJRkxOoRUc7pt/tF5axhdOAf6TDWwHBlXKvvheZiFOvrePLY0BUCa7 rGqy42f163j7Z2wCaPwNFlIqTfKvn5c/xdzgz+P7r3AL0QVYbvQSCGnqtJKDPlU2mfd9 d9mTH1x4VqAbsta5K/H81lMBlrq6jFueFl+DEis5GhBkP2pqMunKFpIxgHOyVl4Qe+bs Ul66j64gMaEgB1Y1391Xmi7d9VOTJE6zDsqrJf+f9fAHPYE0WT8tZHDX220h55xir8yz LkbBekhEyD/uuvlTxRaSVbAGjEFrIVjIoQ60BIiMuHoOzc7/abAsuKhdChswRnM27Gbu UY1A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l11si16753225ejq.208.2019.11.20.09.59.47; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:00:11 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728120AbfKTR5h (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:57:37 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:44010 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726675AbfKTR5g (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 12:57:36 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386251FB; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 09:57:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.37]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DE26D3F6C4; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 09:57:33 -0800 (PST) From: Valentin Schneider To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, qperret@google.com, qais.yousef@arm.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com Subject: [PATCH 3/3] sched/fair: Consider uclamp for "task fits capacity" checks Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 17:55:33 +0000 Message-Id: <20191120175533.4672-4-valentin.schneider@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <20191120175533.4672-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> References: <20191120175533.4672-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org task_fits_capacity() drives CPU selection at wakeup time, and is also used to detect misfit tasks. Right now it does so by comparing task_util_est() with a CPU's capacity, but doesn't take into account uclamp restrictions. There's a few interesting uses that can come out of doing this. For instance, a low uclamp.max value could prevent certain tasks from being flagged as misfit tasks, so they could merrily remain on low-capacity CPUs. Similarly, a high uclamp.min value would steer tasks towards high capacity CPU at wakeup (and, should that fail, later steered via misfit balancing), so such "boosted" tasks would favor CPUs of higher capacity. Introduce uclamp_task_util() and make task_fits_capacity() use it. To keep things consistent between overutilized wakeup CPU selection (wake_cap()) and !overutilized wakeup CPU selection (find_energy_efficient_cpu()), add a task_fits_capacity() check to find_energy_efficient_cpu(). Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider --- kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 ++++++++++- kernel/sched/sched.h | 13 +++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 08a233e97a01..446409252b23 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -3822,7 +3822,7 @@ util_est_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_struct *p, bool task_sleep) static inline int task_fits_capacity(struct task_struct *p, long capacity) { - return fits_capacity(task_util_est(p), capacity); + return fits_capacity(uclamp_task_util(p, task_util_est(p)), capacity); } static inline void update_misfit_status(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq) @@ -6274,6 +6274,15 @@ static int find_energy_efficient_cpu(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu) if (!fits_capacity(util, cpu_cap)) continue; + /* + * Skip CPUs that don't satisfy uclamp requests. Note + * that the above already ensures the CPU has enough + * spare capacity for the task; this is only really for + * uclamp restrictions. + */ + if (!task_fits_capacity(p, capacity_orig_of(cpu))) + continue; + /* Always use prev_cpu as a candidate. */ if (cpu == prev_cpu) { prev_delta = compute_energy(p, prev_cpu, pd); diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 900328c4eeef..74bf08ec1a01 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -2329,6 +2329,14 @@ static inline unsigned long uclamp_rq_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned long util) { return uclamp_rq_util_with(rq, util, NULL); } + +static inline +unsigned long uclamp_task_util(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long util) +{ + return clamp(util, + (unsigned long)uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MIN), + (unsigned long)uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX)); +} #else /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */ static inline unsigned long uclamp_rq_util_with(struct rq *rq, unsigned long util, struct task_struct *p) @@ -2339,6 +2347,11 @@ static inline unsigned long uclamp_rq_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned long util) { return util; } +static inline +unsigned long uclamp_task_util(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long util) +{ + return util; +} #endif /* CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK */ #ifdef arch_scale_freq_capacity -- 2.22.0