Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751245AbWAQBXV (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:23:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751315AbWAQBXU (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:23:20 -0500 Received: from adsl-67-120-171-161.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([67.120.171.161]:17383 "HELO linuxace.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751245AbWAQBXU (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:23:20 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:23:19 -0800 From: Phil Oester To: Justin Piszcz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, apiszcz@lucidpixels.com Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.15.1 + NFS is 4 times slower than FTP!? Message-ID: <20060117012319.GA22161@linuxace.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 369 Lines: 11 On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 08:07:02PM -0500, Justin Piszcz wrote: > I suppose I should try NFS with TCP, yes? Precisely. Phil - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/