Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp3473177ybc; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:50:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzgtqNOipAGrjMz4+9UaoCGSrfVRdtAHXjYXBAsDW54jTb76pXHoijeIXsDBD7LBsgJTn1N X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4ecd:: with SMTP id s13mr12434813wrv.216.1574355023744; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:50:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574355023; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bTaJlwrF4YhtQPKCDpZPzO37yiNkppjuMrpSQDqtRWh3pFHkfa1gYN1D/baUgmv7Oq YFemtUbgNGlYtJwnc91k627/2yNFyCx/GdZGi0wxSRffbW7BK1rKdKIBGprnA0vd9feO ET2qSEhnhpNY/5zrXbXHNaGeUkrIZQXe66jp/yUnn1YO45nZcavHssMzLk8/467sFtxj e2Iq6hnl+IpuGAQzxqCT9C569PwB37njwkAeKBZGZuDtN4SRx4sb5/P7+ctEqn5gkKNZ oEJzLniIa/wXqcmDzQwVwMwt6TjTjzyjYqe0Jn5+cv1xBTmaryAxT2HGThLKSkANAdj5 E//w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=gd/ZKcGNtH1rIbRkU4949LyZO2aRQ/z9y2mRsRwGr7A=; b=DFGuoxivTwnQtJbWpspGjrjx3Fhcp1DQaRmwTSRbjmDGMB6/Mgqy/z/0duPbjXWwiw G0icm5m4VQe0vbU0Bm0aaWO13o0YxSVGFvpRz5Wfe4NgQbYYcM5WrBJuh/YlFEZdgreH LBjTfOX1EsUU6TlN+80S9fVN0owNNKyMzU0bEycO0OX7espWDDFX/MfJsI7xEpBfgDlI m041k0I08kBymTrSB4IhQjWLrxaT0cgHmiUsWW7UviQL996+5QDYBo+zihEXyQMzB5UZ qgERllAzdb/elp1HBcK+nvEvLLkSRoKLq+ISq/BJT/Sed1qn/RNHyPPSMGXlAAIxV15a K3/w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d10si2345766edk.122.2019.11.21.08.49.59; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:50:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726912AbfKUQrM (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:47:12 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:59202 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726279AbfKUQrM (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:47:12 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F8F328; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.255]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A30043F52E; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:47:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 16:47:05 +0000 From: Lorenzo Pieralisi To: Kunihiko Hayashi Cc: Andrew Murray , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu , Jassi Brar , Kishon Vijay Abraham I Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: uniphier: Add checking whether PERST# is deasserted Message-ID: <20191121164705.GA14229@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20191107205239.65C1.4A936039@socionext.com> <20191107124617.GA43905@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <20191108163026.0DFB.4A936039@socionext.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191108163026.0DFB.4A936039@socionext.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 04:30:27PM +0900, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote: > > However, If I understand correctly, doesn't your solution only work some > > of the time? What happens if you boot both machines at the same time, > > and PERST# isn't asserted prior to the kernel booting? > > I think it contains an annoying problem. > > If PERST# isn't toggled prior to the kernel booting, PERST# remains asserted > and the RC driver can't access PCI bus. > > As a result, this patch works and deasserts PERST# (and EP configuration will > be lost). So boot sequence needs to include deasserting PERST#. I am sorry but I have lost you. Can you explain to us why checking that PERST# is deasserted guarantees you that: - The EP has bootstrapped - It is safe not to toggle it again (and also skip uniphier_pcie_ltssm_enable()) Please provide details of the HW configuration so that we understand what's actually supposed to happen and why this patch fixes the issue you are facing. Thanks, Lorenzo