Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp3482409ybc; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:00:02 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwFc8wFYPSDgn/e8SlJ8u2Y1z/waU2H1ZbYADfRLhLLYIaBkziMQ8SjVIW+NyJaCbRQrOxt X-Received: by 2002:a1c:46:: with SMTP id 67mr11813127wma.51.1574355602148; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:00:02 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574355602; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vw2kbIk0G9+HBUIZZJkjsMtmhiJtwIHemKI3gF6DGM/FSXxfnHY+QQmzKlxVD6rL6y I5E1vNG15+XSvLIOFVgqjPJviSuWDaWYN6p2FeKtPhcKM3ReyKwTrMMKWEdqBygBoE7E Ba/sn+NnC8B06fOKOikCnKdJVa/rGQwPohA0Cd9i0/0lPwnoQaumIP71/iITbSZ+SXq3 J2rlAEQDfmEUPrlgYxpwrCiuUAuBrMh96xPM/Whs2VfzO04zMSIOrlyMDdLzjdC61h9t mExNVcHDxCi/qiHRJ102WcZTyIFYfmQeyFNeZuCW4RuIoHhZli+/+h/NRdpvfuZYO6nI fAeg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=rs2UyyOfjk+a+uubCpA54vHU4bdaxT3WN2RGWCgoouA=; b=LGOgkXsiP4AVdxmMotJIUQjEmNrhiaZaphIY+yYR/DTr0THxIOZ7UsmH241A2BzYsx uTwYFTB1KT1meUpsBFK8uYMXiDjbnc/vsj1XIPcvKHEnwwPZnRtYDtQ4sfXDcdfCieNE X3AUoKfjHnLGl2Y4f4ppfd5JvTWZLy/Bfza735Cr34BcQkvx6nqMXhDRdARBziDyjCsi f+z4CnHaaiBhVGmU2eNw/KqGYeZWBBOmtNEK32rVvld7Aw8Y67MUTEwkx7bFJkp/9Id7 Pc5V7JmLB3u/UAsjUF4xkvZIkZ7LOupTBU60EY8FQ40B3Qg1DpuyLe/Im/w8Ts0NAyNe 2MCA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=j0NY1Y7f; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c9si2521110edy.72.2019.11.21.08.59.37; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 09:00:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=j0NY1Y7f; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726634AbfKUQ6a (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:58:30 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:42074 "EHLO mail-wr1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726279AbfKUQ63 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:58:29 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id a15so5294553wrf.9 for ; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:58:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rs2UyyOfjk+a+uubCpA54vHU4bdaxT3WN2RGWCgoouA=; b=j0NY1Y7fF3cmcF0j4/XqBAiSzPWlT94u4KZxOQ4SHd2gjiI01XbgtBNXJT6Ljy/utj xFUHcENj/jnU4MquyJmcTyvQX8HTYrOIqzm0hv6oPR68tFwXxV85GR+v6lgAmSOsCNo9 2Q3xVhYZC/gBSYvnkx0OIJSo4/TbS/dpfr/5DWoohs4JZJn2p9Fl7kJ692QsZ/CXYVHD IrNKPEgOpAD3qqPDbvRCGR5iNFfK8Djh5613qgfMfBpaHofWU36Dx8uTcahMErOaPzxl y/Y0QqxJR8221w926USJfWjMzEHGW6cfES5S5VqR5jbadtHLK7TyCbJyIeImQFSQVt2C uFNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rs2UyyOfjk+a+uubCpA54vHU4bdaxT3WN2RGWCgoouA=; b=PtDxxX6D3o8DbDVH7AkI3KdERVXghoFpJxI6JwzWmLpNEVU7WZYvx593xL3oAjEXQV Dkgrk+tkZ4aULKUW5PN74qTfG67mWNCh5i1dBgfHqNbhHpg+r2OD6s5A2v800150Bsdo xSONO4rAzhvqkBvd2X61MzGUO1dYGMVOzvkJlF8mWfoyInkxsi+T7hVpIP8wIcff9Ytk yE4WV1qOj0AkOCeKeZTJ+S/u+RN3GfwPnvzf0bxc5W8fza2sLY6s6Jjhz63krXtiZZaf lfn6fRZCywVSo4yN9nHcYr1ojbZpBAgpkgLQSKXwbSomMaJBHE5UjBz6pW5gIK4UjwSq TWnw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU+gKT2vMMNI71BFDo0b0D3Kfju0Eb6g5dFZcGIVfE/8GJfcFzx ZRwxIea8Tvc3+zOLqW58rgs= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5308:: with SMTP id e8mr4517132wrv.77.1574355506478; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:58:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmail.com (54033286.catv.pool.telekom.hu. [84.3.50.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c11sm3770478wrv.92.2019.11.21.08.58.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:58:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 17:58:24 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Davidlohr Bueso , peterz@infradead.org, bp@alien8.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm/pat: Simplify the free_memtype() control flow Message-ID: <20191121165824.GA12042@gmail.com> References: <20191021231924.25373-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20191021231924.25373-2-dave@stgolabs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 21 Oct 2019, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > int rbt_memtype_check_insert(struct memtype *new, > > enum page_cache_mode *ret_type) > > { > > int err = 0; > > > > err = memtype_rb_check_conflict(&memtype_rbroot, new->start, new->end, > > - new->type, ret_type); > > - > > - if (!err) { > > - if (ret_type) > > - new->type = *ret_type; > > - > > - new->subtree_max_end = new->end; > > - memtype_rb_insert(&memtype_rbroot, new); > > - } > > + new->type, ret_type); > > + if (err) > > + goto done; > > Please return err here. That goto is pointless. > > > + > > + if (ret_type) > > + new->type = *ret_type; > > + memtype_interval_insert(new, &memtype_rbroot); > > +done: > > return err; > > } > > Other than that. > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Thanks - I rebased the v2 version in x86/mm with this cleanup included. Two days ago I noticed a similarly quirky control flow in free_memtype() as well, and fixed it via the patch below. Ingo ==============> From: Ingo Molnar Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:18:56 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] x86/mm/pat: Simplify the free_memtype() control flow Simplify/streamline the quirky handling of the pat_pagerange_is_ram() logic, and get rid of the 'err' local variable. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 11 +++-------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c index ea7da7e62e17..af049920e59a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c @@ -656,7 +656,6 @@ int reserve_memtype(u64 start, u64 end, enum page_cache_mode req_type, int free_memtype(u64 start, u64 end) { - int err = -EINVAL; int is_range_ram; struct memtype *entry; @@ -671,14 +670,10 @@ int free_memtype(u64 start, u64 end) return 0; is_range_ram = pat_pagerange_is_ram(start, end); - if (is_range_ram == 1) { - - err = free_ram_pages_type(start, end); - - return err; - } else if (is_range_ram < 0) { + if (is_range_ram == 1) + return free_ram_pages_type(start, end); + if (is_range_ram < 0) return -EINVAL; - } spin_lock(&memtype_lock); entry = memtype_erase(start, end);