Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: only free map once in osl.c
To:     Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@arista.com>
Cc:     lenb@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
References: <20191120054728.0979695C0FE4@us180.sjc.aristanetworks.com>
 <CAJwJo6ZTSw93zKdN3i-YqVtEEwh4qWc22Hk-emHvJth+HsaQbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+HUmGh+tEnP7n+_FcJuwZOF4HBgfatLwUa8a=K_BdqnKETNCw@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1bb01499-34f7-c4a5-a910-bb6419e9e476@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:57:20 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.2.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+HUmGh+tEnP7n+_FcJuwZOF4HBgfatLwUa8a=K_BdqnKETNCw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 11/21/19 10:49 PM, Francesco Ruggeri wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 1:19 PM Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Francesco,
>>
>> I believe, there's still an issue with your patch.
>>
>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 05:50, Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@arista.com> wrote:
>>> @@ -472,10 +477,11 @@ void acpi_os_unmap_generic_address(struct acpi_generic_address *gas)
>>>                 mutex_unlock(&acpi_ioremap_lock);
>>>                 return;
>>>         }
>>> -       acpi_os_drop_map_ref(map);
>>> +       refcount = acpi_os_drop_map_ref(map);
>>>         mutex_unlock(&acpi_ioremap_lock);
>>
>> Here comes acpi_os_get_iomem() increasing the refcount again.
> 
> Thanks Dmitry.
> I think that any code that increments the refcount does so after
> looking for map in acpi_ioremap under acpi_ioremap_lock,
> and the process that drops the last reference removes map
> from the list, also under acpi_ioremap_lock, so I am not sure
> this could happen.
> The synchronize_rcu_expedited in acpi_os_map_cleanup should
> then take care of any other references to map (which it is my
> understanding require acpi_ioremap_lock or rcu read lock).

Ah, right you are!
Sorry for a false alarm.

Thanks,
          Dmitry