Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 22 Nov 2019 00:35:24 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To:     Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, stefan@agner.ch,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>, sstabellini@kernel.org,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
        Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, alexios.zavras@intel.com,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, allison@lohutok.net,
        jgross@suse.com, steve.capper@arm.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, info@metux.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm/arm64/xen: use C inlines for privcmd_call
Message-ID: <20191122003524.GH25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <20191121184805.414758-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
 <20191121184805.414758-2-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
 <20191122002258.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <CA+CK2bDtADA2eVwJAUEPhpic8vXWegh8yLjo6Q6WmXZDxAfJpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20191122003403.GG25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191122003403.GG25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:34:03AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 07:30:41PM -0500, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_SW_DOMAIN_PAN
> > > > +static __always_inline void uaccess_enable(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     unsigned long val = DACR_UACCESS_ENABLE;
> > > > +
> > > > +     asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c3, c0, 0" : : "r" (val));
> > > > +     isb();
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static __always_inline void uaccess_disable(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     unsigned long val = DACR_UACCESS_ENABLE;
> > 
> > Oops, should be DACR_UACCESS_DISABLE.
> > 
> > > > +
> > > > +     asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c3, c0, 0" : : "r" (val));
> > > > +     isb();
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > Rather than inventing these, why not use uaccess_save_and_enable()..
> > > uaccess_restore() around the Xen call?
> > 
> > Thank you for suggestion: uaccess_enable() and uaccess_disable() are
> > common calls with arm64, so I will need them, but I think I can use
> > set_domain() with DACR_UACCESS_DISABLE /DACR_UACCESS_ENABLE inside
> > these inlines.
> 
> That may be, but be very careful that you only use them in ARMv7-only
> code.  Using them elsewhere is unsafe as the domain register is used
> for other purposes, and merely blatting over it (as your
> uaccess_enable and uaccess_disable functions do) is unsafe.

In fact, I'll turn that into a bit more than a suggestion.  I'll make
it a NAK on adding them to 32-bit ARM.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up