Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp4099488ybc; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:47:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwxjpFNru9DU02uzKRY54mG0i8lnKHwG1ZNGd5ix1oeLlqTp6RLZT6zm1Wjo/zkbV9ZbfJ6 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:600b:: with SMTP id o11mr18623639ejj.175.1574394464372; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:47:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574394464; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=syP8NmaOHHNTeoyOgngq/qpZRvwvPumL/YtqtZ7r7UXiKxIWpYd9F1q6U5aoM32cyI GIN43+EeGU22GMzUubkuO56iuIsDB17Sz9Dc8R0+NfI9GbJ/nEDklga0KhngAoEpLgYt a3/gC3ybhSW4s4NJoTp6n+0MOFmKxxaCZZ3yMlPi1fFemBeJzOO8s5/9NpZGXGWWD4Li jtN2P9t8yNqKisLtORnj9woDQh0EHqJbnCPaNThtk8xHxEkguQbC4JAeoXXDhUUlyw8R UkbrsAljSCn4Zux3lzpb8u1CUxBYwVNAFwLgDRPbiMpYLgIyQrbroGZ6wasu01p/6f/c Je3A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject; bh=WihHlXNujxb9FW1OMf7BOu4214ITKF1tu0svk2ZkWGY=; b=h7+Wved8Si445tOf5W/am0yutMa69LEYWmozPlRSbQUorMgAfabY8ODpFPuoXtJ265 Qw0/8bG/Bm3CShUswSoNCDDlqbSyp0yc7VTd3fimW7GuQYbtOZJBkrB2oLtLgE9n52r7 PoyfaLcjKMAfRuFYwzeJGFvYf29e77qvWtax4gbcFMAqOOk9mv1alFAYCdjGd42AnksQ egK7AcWxjuryfvVyXIG+aUYQ41hq7eaYQc7WRaXWcqtcSMxIjLfV/skj9GBtJIcV6FpK Enpg6NsMD7SZk80LoVZfda08gHXaV7K09aa/QxdGnueSovxWX5C1vn3PNPW6CW63Hmig A2hA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ss14si3363075ejb.195.2019.11.21.19.47.20; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:47:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726666AbfKVDpZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:45:25 -0500 Received: from szxga05-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.191]:6699 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726343AbfKVDpY (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:45:24 -0500 Received: from DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id C054EA336454F4F117DE; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:45:22 +0800 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (10.177.223.23) by DGGEMS405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:45:17 +0800 Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 00/10] Rework REFCOUNT_FULL using atomic_fetch_* operations To: Will Deacon , CC: Kees Cook , Ingo Molnar , "Elena Reshetova" , Peter Zijlstra , Ard Biesheuvel References: <20191121115902.2551-1-will@kernel.org> From: Hanjun Guo Message-ID: <2d008348-e000-0627-132f-7fc8990de3a4@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:44:55 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191121115902.2551-1-will@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.177.223.23] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019/11/21 19:58, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi everybody, > > This is a resend of version four of the patches I posted here: > > v4: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191030143035.19440-1-will@kernel.org > > Previous versions can be found at: > > v1: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190802101000.12958-1-will@kernel.org > v2: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190827163204.29903-1-will@kernel.org > v3: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191007154703.5574-1-will@kernel.org > > I didn't receive any feedback last time around, other than some positive > noises from Kees, so please consider this for inclusion in mainline. This time I tested this patch set on both ARM64 and x86 server, against 5.4-rc8. On ARM64, similar test case and the similar performance improvement. On X86, I tested on a 24 cores Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620, with kernel compile (make -j) for test case, and no issue was found. Tested-by: Hanjun Guo Thanks Hanjun