Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932507AbWAQORs (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:17:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932506AbWAQORs (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:17:48 -0500 Received: from smtp006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.95]:51643 "HELO smtp006.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932507AbWAQORp (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:17:45 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.it; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=tWGkfa5y5boUmQ5VTML62W9TQ4PiJBIKGcN3tfFIsIruZWTeKtVLvVZJEmABE4EWDzaKi7LiazhZ//Zzsd9ql3UfZsVrCAoyOBvd4b4IIc23eqxTlQpRnWFz7dRax06U2NQyh0QTufUa8fh6lAy+Y1oixU2Cq+CvtqXgJyEyJxE= ; From: Blaisorblade To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 9/11] UML - Implement soft interrupts Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:17:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: Jeff Dike , akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200601152139.k0FLdp1G027747@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <200601170124.32076.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> <20060117033227.GB17171@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> In-Reply-To: <20060117033227.GB17171@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601171517.38199.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1303 Lines: 36 On Tuesday 17 January 2006 04:32, Jeff Dike wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:24:31AM +0100, Blaisorblade wrote: > > ~25 %? Good! Which is delay vs. host? > > Delay vs a UML without the patch. > > > A curiosity - did you look at the similar code in Ingo Molnar's VCPU > > patch? I never found the time to split it out and compare differencies. I > > just remember it using assembler inserts for (maybe atomic) bitmask > > manipulations. > > It was separate from VCPU, conceptually, but I got only a blob comprising everything - never seen it splitout (or maybe I split that out and forgot?) > but I never really looked at it since I already > had this. Some day I will to see if there are any trick in it that I > should use. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/