Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932094AbWAQQCb (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:02:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932101AbWAQQCb (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:02:31 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:41921 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932094AbWAQQCa (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:02:30 -0500 Subject: Re: RFC [patch 13/34] PID Virtualization Define new task_pid api From: Arjan van de Ven To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hubertus Franke , Cedric Le Goater , Dave Hansen In-Reply-To: <20060117155600.GF20632@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> References: <20060117143258.150807000@sergelap> <20060117143326.283450000@sergelap> <1137511972.3005.33.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20060117155600.GF20632@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:02:28 +0100 Message-Id: <1137513748.3005.34.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 (2.2.3-2.fc4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 403 Lines: 13 > Is that approach (keeping task->pid as the real pid and dropping the > task_pid() macro) preferred by all? it sure is what I think is the best approach - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/