Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 14:47:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 14:47:16 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:2301 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 14:47:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 11:47:29 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: "Albert D. Cahalan" Cc: Mike Borrelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: No love for the PPC Message-ID: <20011013114729.D16500@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Albert D. Cahalan" , Mike Borrelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200110130452.f9D4qG9288830@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200110130452.f9D4qG9288830@saturn.cs.uml.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 12:52:16AM -0400, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > Mike Borrelli writes: > > Anyway, the real question is, why does the ppc arhitecture /always/ break > > between versions? > > At the most recent Ottata Linux Symposium, there was a PowerPC > session with about 20 people. Somebody did a poll, asking what > people used. I was the only person who dared to use a kernel > from Linus. Everone else was using the BenH and BitKeeper ones. > > This is a sorry state of affairs. Actually, this is normal for new ports on Linux. PPC is relatively new, m68k is developed with their own cvs, as is Intel IA64. I'm sure others will be able to quote about other arches... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/