Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com>
To:     <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>, <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
        <andrew@lunn.ch>, <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
        <f.fainelli@gmail.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
        <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
CC:     <chenwandun@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: dsa: ocelot: fix "should it be static?" warnings
Date:   Fri, 22 Nov 2019 20:32:45 +0800
Message-ID: <1574425965-97890-1-git-send-email-chenwandun@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Fix following sparse warnings:
drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c:351:6: warning: symbol 'felix_txtstamp' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
index 167e415..b7f9246 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c
@@ -348,8 +348,8 @@ static bool felix_rxtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
 	return false;
 }
 
-bool felix_txtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
-		    struct sk_buff *clone, unsigned int type)
+static bool felix_txtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
+			   struct sk_buff *clone, unsigned int type)
 {
 	struct ocelot *ocelot = ds->priv;
 	struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = ocelot->ports[port];
-- 
2.7.4