Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp655093ybc; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:55:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyVF1lVDTXW0BA6QU2F/7Utw9PyNl0W5MPhAUbnta86z03gmTNtEZOZRPet9ej9EsSgOHZI X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:404d:: with SMTP id y13mr24410793ejj.276.1574448945819; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:55:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574448945; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NaO/jilu8EkKGLDKfoOGiU1L0eFjIZrcZJI29oIbkDFTCEBiDO9Zkn1kNFMZSjAbTt OZtLTYU69OFf9n476uxvZ4hGS2hQ667SLBb01Bn8X/So80+xPxFVlSqNgNjm1qVQ3TjI 1iSxzesOzDcrbtvOoSlDS93ypslQkVV6fu2DEQzpyogRrjef/sIPkzEGXX26PhdwbH0v ARD+m6Eg+EnJ2vy8LVxgiRN3DLBBT/QrQH1xcVnTRjKnbH7dobx1dSlAaIxJ0bz7CcqP xDsdGo5/s5SNjltA9y8GutilAq9FPoJbufp1x8zZ8mwkDzbmwSuGage9fY+heYfeJ5Wm hCjg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=6E9NZkdr/kbq+mZ57VvACbVb5vZgZvusBXUrNoSxstw=; b=lSFxB7VQO6dHKIzoUMm3iAvpskvXODYEI4yoZAyXyWUBl3SZfvRXkw3dpi0xwzISDG +Lc8h2vCbJrIJe/gdNLLv3M9htjbz1ikjqaoC4Gx5A/7s7xqSghTxhxrUPAXr33a731i WFAZl2qQgSGrvesB7QsTw40rD4+lF2sdrBkHaZgNc8+w8ulJ432AfSGQIvpxl/A46zZ/ uweblmPC/LhDkwvPS0QTnAEoT7FR2acI7YewsJCOcEC6iAkWhMeu/UPMmDa6yIjAa63D rI9OAxhIDV7MeW/sqPfzc1j6ZWquhjbacGd4DFAH8dMb5h0qRxK1Eb3b+ddrANR3MQuw 7ulg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=POFeHIe6; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z22si4859828ejm.326.2019.11.22.10.55.20; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:55:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b=POFeHIe6; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726887AbfKVSx1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:53:27 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f195.google.com ([209.85.214.195]:42942 "EHLO mail-pl1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726062AbfKVSx0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:53:26 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f195.google.com with SMTP id j12so3448293plt.9 for ; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:53:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=6E9NZkdr/kbq+mZ57VvACbVb5vZgZvusBXUrNoSxstw=; b=POFeHIe6ACfTnec5KX2EeN65fJwFF1hfvM4Lt1ZT7dwcHSth+HJwcXT8ra2mkMpwcO JPKJrDH1h40U/EB+aEw58r6Y+EAxEzYEtbQ6oOpocTDpdwjWjulybSIMZowaFNsgk+Vp ghsIg/vlAjDpeoBLoZ8F1xIj79m7XYbyz9Mic= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=6E9NZkdr/kbq+mZ57VvACbVb5vZgZvusBXUrNoSxstw=; b=LkcDoKDEHP+viSIAa9mwEPFCajFUWgv/1VoDZRIujmwI1nx4AUSsy6WS7C8Ho2fYKT 7GKjLF8jUJFoe1cZ9aYwYx1b3GbyNQO2+1RJJGRxCFs5ULQdFA2k3YiA+DM0qaZmYZaC UWM2YqBiKi9C7I4WwmZwE4wgDqW9L24/ZxURv6gEkkMZMqEqk7gV8xzfQjxxjHz4GcDI oHEfKoiX0+ORY1VwK/BFiHb5+CDretMoEKaxx/71fEAbevH0cQBeqEfJhd2yGAm0ZiFa 5NQkRYZYMqwALFFCpXtlp1nUZa4nbqrrtvXGfKhHND2IGb7zwNsxdWglZ9Jg3401zuu+ Wo3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXu1C3/iB/gaxorf6j9MeAm7TWr/J9Ty1bDYepMP870Aq61wXEo M7GW6pDPNZfhwXG7plIohaVNwQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8502:: with SMTP id bj2mr16025669plb.303.1574448804706; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:53:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a13sm8161490pfi.187.2019.11.22.10.53.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:53:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 10:53:22 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Jens Axboe Cc: syzbot+21cfe1f803e0e158acf1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Replace bio_check_ro()'s WARN_ON() Message-ID: <201911221052.0FDE1A1@keescook> References: <20180824211535.GA22251@beast> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180824211535.GA22251@beast> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Friendly ping! I keep tripping over this. Can this please get applied so we can silence syzbot and avoid needless WARNs? :) -Kees On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 02:15:35PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: > As described in commit 96c6a32ccb55a ("include/asm-generic/bug.h: clarify > valid uses of WARN()"), this replaces a userspace-reachable WARN_ON() > with pr_warn_once(). The reachability is even noted in the existing > comment. This appears to be an "expected by unlikely" condition, so > getting rid of the WARN_ON() means kernel fuzzers will stop reporting > the problem. Additionally un-breaks the error string so it can more > easily be found with grep. > > Reported-by: syzbot+21cfe1f803e0e158acf1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > Cc: Jens Axboe > Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook > --- > block/blk-core.c | 6 ++---- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c > index dee56c282efb..470c3cea8cb0 100644 > --- a/block/blk-core.c > +++ b/block/blk-core.c > @@ -2166,11 +2166,9 @@ static inline bool bio_check_ro(struct bio *bio, struct hd_struct *part) > if (part->policy && (op_is_write(op) && !op_is_flush(op))) { > char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE]; > > - WARN_ONCE(1, > - "generic_make_request: Trying to write " > - "to read-only block-device %s (partno %d)\n", > + /* Older lvm-tools actually triggers this. */ > + pr_warn_once("Trying to write to read-only block-device %s (partno %d)\n", > bio_devname(bio, b), part->partno); > - /* Older lvm-tools actually trigger this */ > return false; > } > > -- > 2.17.1 > > > -- > Kees Cook > Pixel Security -- Kees Cook