Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp682146ybc; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:21:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw8CTPmgCax9JKW4cevuAADOTIvTiHfb2aWrRyOAblcg9E8eepwesFS9Ns45ztIwhT68b92 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5e05:: with SMTP id n5mr23931674eju.116.1574450491397; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:21:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574450491; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lv9TtsCW4ARd4vdF7y85HCRkTeZHaR4LttZTdmjawRWAEhj+rudkLFLTjH/ZAqbQzi 3hJZLdv6IBvkBgOpyD3UMBHy/cPChTEQum+KqOSHewywI3qyYYbQPMdcOMUGOxgIxGYR IBUrjK35pfJ77WillqcO/so4ivSulIuMjF7tEBLU2p5x4eTYQlEDbM/js2CUhe3gEENG /DbKJ/d1PcjvLbdjOfJe7n5h3tEwVphFrwLHIHZtS0Wn+h7rKD/nT05hcSSpH+pbKGgq bQJLkPVspNAD3LjVwjC8nzeC3PNHN1G9gCDDznypt8NdqHW14MoC/13wOgIkP4tWeq13 5wdA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=zXZ5An73cOvg+3TJstET2bmgD9aySdlN4do8x9VW7s0=; b=xqFcHaF6SJyWLNBNl6LqEA2EhdcvXhwje37RPbZRKdTtIkWK8E8jZRW1W7+TZH1J0j mxlPhrcK4pgoATTCMhqd7fGWEwvCeLMoGulK4PetWPfkYXbcm4NGsR+/YWcee2ksYzXT BQzk59CahgNrKRwwd9Cncfqk1R63c9q+QPr11tlSn07YUDk1Arlo4CUbY0Ha94U4bZl9 +inkbpb5z4Zvz9MTDiKJWELliqquFUDMs9nr+Gw22Yw6qQ+S7JFSGrL3rUGcQZmDvHWv o0tskiBzUCd5EYfWoLtNZhRyUWA0P8/ofrzQ1ZIYo7rPpilxQepc+iC2U6PH7YZb6lws j3IQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x26si4991277ejc.17.2019.11.22.11.21.06; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:21:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727123AbfKVTRW (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:17:22 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51734 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726698AbfKVTRV (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:17:21 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6AAB275; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 19:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1574449256.2659.2.camel@suse.com> Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in si470x_int_in_callback (2) From: Oliver Neukum To: Alan Stern , syzbot Cc: andreyknvl@google.com, hverkuil@xs4all.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 20:00:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Freitag, den 22.11.2019, 10:35 -0500 schrieb Alan Stern: > On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, syzbot wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > syzbot has tested the proposed patch but the reproducer still triggered > > crash: > > INFO: rcu detected stall in dummy_timer > > > > radio-si470x 1-1:0.0: non-zero urb status (-71) > > radio-si470x 4-1:0.0: non-zero urb status (-71) > > radio-si470x 3-1:0.0: non-zero urb status (-71) > > Oliver: > > The reason for this stall is because the driver goes into a tight > resubmit loop when the interrupt URB completes with an unrecognized > error status. Instead, the driver should log an error message and > avoid resubmitting. Error recovery can be done at a higher level. > > In other words, change the > > goto resubmit; /* Maybe we can recover. */ > > line in the completion handler into a return. I thought so, too. That is why I poisoned the URB. Am I dense? Regards Oliver