Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   "Valdis Kl=?utf-8?Q?=c4=93?=tnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>
To:     kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc:     Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hch@lst.de, linkinjeon@gmail.com,
        Markus.Elfring@web.de, sj1557.seo@samsung.com, dwagner@suse.de,
        nborisov@suse.com
Subject: Signed-off-by: (was Re: [PATCH] exfat: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings
In-Reply-To: <20191123155221.gkukcyakvvfdghcj@4978f4969bb8>
References: <20191121052618.31117-13-namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
 <20191123155221.gkukcyakvvfdghcj@4978f4969bb8>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1574561358_2911P";
         micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date:   Sat, 23 Nov 2019 21:09:18 -0500
Message-ID: <329028.1574561358@turing-police>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

--==_Exmh_1574561358_2911P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 23:52:21 +0800, kbuild test robot said:
> From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> fs/exfat/file.c:50:10-11: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'exfat_allow_set_time' with return type bool

The warning and fix themselves look OK..

> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>

But somehow, this strikes me as fishy.

Or more correctly, it looks reasonable to me, but seems to clash with the
Developer's Certificate of Origin as described in submitting-patches.rst, which
makes the assumption that the patch submitter is a carbon-based life form. In
particular, I doubt the kbuild test robot can understand the thing, and I have
*no* idea who/what ends up owning the GPLv2 copyright on software automatically
created by other software.

Or are we OK on this?


--==_Exmh_1574561358_2911P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Exmh version 2.9.0 11/07/2018
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=DjNi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1574561358_2911P--