Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964859AbWAQWFh (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:05:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964861AbWAQWFh (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:05:37 -0500 Received: from linux01.gwdg.de ([134.76.13.21]:34258 "EHLO linux01.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964859AbWAQWFh (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:05:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:05:27 +0100 (MET) From: Jan Engelhardt To: Antonio Vargas cc: Linus Torvalds , Diego Calleja , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.16-rc1 In-Reply-To: <69304d110601171304h34c16fbfuf59df390c0fc58fd@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20060117183916.399b030f.diegocg@gmail.com> <69304d110601171304h34c16fbfuf59df390c0fc58fd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1128 Lines: 29 > >Maybe the way to make modern-style linux development (post 2.5) more >manageable for mere mortals is to stop integrating things when the >shortlog is so big that it can't be posted to the mailing list? Less >changes, easier to see if you are able to help testing ;) > Ridiculous, we'll never get there! Just look at 2.6.16-rc1 - oh, there was no shortlog posted? You probably don't know the mailing list, but I think it does not accept mails beyond 40K (some guess), but for sure it does not let 100KB through. The 2.6.16-rc1 shortlogs would still need to shrank by 1.3MB to get where you want. However, if you read the description of [PATCH]es, you are already there (which is, though, a combination of goes-in and stays-out). Jan Engelhardt -- | Alphagate Systems, http://alphagate.hopto.org/ | jengelh's site, http://jengelh.hopto.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/