Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp2953380ybc; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:48:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxFZJU1Ok/3fBUPEk0WQahIL7tLdDT+rXhDJFDKefirynA1r8jWp+W1WpPZ266MGgfgMePs X-Received: by 2002:a50:9f65:: with SMTP id b92mr18881027edf.63.1574693334707; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:48:54 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574693334; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hPmpiYLWIOWthuZS6N41cWHqj31ryPC5uybDN3SHDDJ1ImuXqKKHho3XH8TZ0XunY5 t1Xc/bBZtWzAqb4K0fYvlqdY2wJKYvT8M817xv/T6UOAtAUSC0vxmzKaVnmoSidGk7y5 gYqE8BjldCEfQczD4GNqGATpAtdF+/DCkY+NvgXAA5kT15lCi5Ne2ffbOTBUFHP765cV zbjAwPsGJIZGx11ZcUvIUGLQS4bSKPQjLegJsNsZUGA7wJoceUs2eXis67T+7E9MtMV5 k/iv99S42MaETFVUUwy1EwFxzndV074a8/CqGimLGiy6NOX0eGkVlGdSkoy9DtsBPOTO GfHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=r/rH+NQ5Nc/BWQDI4BKTzuHh1VHH5eObr0MxCAp99Ho=; b=PkQYHM0HDeZwNUS3wU1wNc3TpQrJeaqkXqpagFAvYJ7hGEAsFtbreCKKJ7pBCXxuTi vMS0jJ6I+JelDJdgdKmxZKSPaCwnrWHNQm+OQoaeCgs+RGf40YNxYHcTBmu2p21UB9BN fh+1yAoWhgj+I6fbJ6/E4Z28uBwbsL54/OccZnIh83ASp6pICelBckCGqhn4YXClue36 S8Vy+1KwOLRoejnSvzKHV1CtTG6U1Lu4/eEhPw9sDzC8TRxrh/96Dhnb3g/kEkoHYOeE +NFT/QK5rdkG+HxdXTXtCYzEhHIR4p+1arhG/sTK55KcRdYWpOvHMLsnhby+UTZi5Bjd vbMA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t17si4666320ejd.401.2019.11.25.06.48.30; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:48:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728284AbfKYOqi (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:46:38 -0500 Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:54605 "EHLO relay10.mail.gandi.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727918AbfKYOqi (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:46:38 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [153.3.124.115]) (Authenticated sender: fly@kernel.page) by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB06A24000E; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:46:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 22:46:03 +0800 From: Pengfei Li To: Michal Hocko Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, vbabka@suse.cz, cl@linux.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, guro@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, fly@kernel.page Subject: Re: [RFC v1 00/19] Modify zonelist to nodelist v1 Message-ID: <20191125224603.688cb69c.fly@kernel.page> In-Reply-To: <20191125084058.GD31714@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20191121151811.49742-1-fly@kernel.page> <20191121180401.GL23213@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191122230543.2f106c80.fly@kernel.page> <20191125084058.GD31714@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 09:40:58 +0100 Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 22-11-19 23:05:43, Pengfei Li wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 19:04:01 +0100 > > Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > On Thu 21-11-19 23:17:52, Pengfei Li wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Since I don't currently have multiple node NUMA systems, I > > > > would be grateful if anyone would like to test this series of > > > > patches. > > > > > > I didn't really get to think about the actual patchset. From a > > > very quick glance I am wondering whether we need to optimize as > > > there are usually only small amount of numa nodes. But I am quite > > > busy so I cannot really do any claims. > > > > Thanks for your comments. > > > > I think it's time to modify the zonelist to nodelist because the > > zonelist is always in node order and the page reclamation is based > > on node. > > > > I will do more performance testing to show that multi-node systems > > will benefit from this series of patches. > > Sensible performance numbers on multiple workloads (ideally some real > world ones rather than artificial microbenchmarks) is essential for a > performance optimization that is this large. Thank you for your suggestion. But this is probably a bit difficult because I don't have a NUMA server to do real-world workload testing. I will do as many performance benchmarks as possible, just like Mel Gorman's "Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v9" (https://lwn.net/Articles/694121/). -- Pengfei