Received: by 2002:a25:7ec1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id z184csp3215816ybc; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:47:20 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz8kv4px+DT5b651D4Zw4Vc75lufFgl/88DChjZX5NxQ0FLI7i4LVf4WMzTjLYxujNmoIuq X-Received: by 2002:a50:f783:: with SMTP id h3mr20106601edn.168.1574707640468; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:47:20 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1574707640; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NcpaaHOtBgkKkZm+7tngOnUomolcQCZz6nMo0ieMgs6Hnk44DJ2S8el3wt70XCtNpZ so0GdOXQa7z0hyu430itmT87151zNYnjKs3lyyipoDebyJFbY6Gm7mqXITIhw+H/QR14 PebR/OBkI0kfqGDyAk9gK5BjhmN9LpnEkJ6XxexxEIFDWFbcMfi1duvX1G8pjOaNJMzt SD4RxR6M9gtI4Wre4sUIQipMBO8Xd8aLyuerPcvb5uUfr3hDQfLIfWK2nCKPd121ecxq oVocd+uUEXYatAVA6zzWpJK01bCPOV2Y/TRvytz3VsjtP4WD6hT3s+bRtE44xNOt/i+F JNig== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id; bh=vCTpOjezOhynnpZ/ACJm/EDWOPVVW0IhgLw8E6MyiVU=; b=lrAsnFuzPNPppJWin188ZWkid2N0sM/H0UoozqaPoC/tw60t0JJCdf4+ELChR/koWg 7dUIl3E/PmFiKy9ua4Mhge0A1IYfgOJe/eUUoK2agwZKRkWpSAk7KmdsUaRmEso85f2B Bd+ZKgghgGKfhK4y67XTuEH3ThFzB2uQu1ipCAsMeMQuUDFEMNLn6IFelbegHMzMxK5q svzQb8CgufkCH40aYzdVBotKNSp4CE+mDErnwDKuFRD8aTtLu0JuatjEY+0hwRFPsmub GcbbFCUJWO1NaJyQ5VVyNOQ6IZzlcWWW2d5IqQB5TqTIDx9Z2ZXaWZnV9bzTvk4/qOwM 6nYA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x17si5049894ejs.178.2019.11.25.10.46.55; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:47:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728719AbfKYQAW (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:00:22 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53404 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728454AbfKYQAW (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:00:22 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED843BF17; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 16:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1574697961.16378.5.camel@suse.cz> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance From: Giovanni Gherdovich To: Doug Smythies , 'Srinivas Pandruvada' , 'Thomas Gleixner' , 'Ingo Molnar' , 'Peter Zijlstra' , 'Borislav Petkov' , 'Len Brown' , "'Rafael J . Wysocki'" Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 'Mel Gorman' , 'Matt Fleming' , 'Viresh Kumar' , 'Juri Lelli' , 'Paul Turner' , 'Vincent Guittot' , 'Quentin Perret' , 'Dietmar Eggemann' Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:06:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <000001d5a29b$c944fd70$5bcef850$@net> References: <20191113124654.18122-1-ggherdovich@suse.cz> <20191113124654.18122-2-ggherdovich@suse.cz> <000001d5a29b$c944fd70$5bcef850$@net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2019-11-23 at 23:49 -0800, Doug Smythies wrote: > ... > Kernel 5.4-rc8 + revert, intel_cpufreq/schedutil: 3899 seconds > Kernel 5.4-rc8 + gg 6 + revert, intel_cpufreq/schedutil: 2740.7 seconds > Ratio: 0.70 (as expected) > Kernel 5.4-rc8, intel_cpufreq/schedutil: 2334.7 seconds (faster than expected) > Kernel 5.4-rc8 + gg 6 patch set, intel_cpufreq/schedutil: 2275.0 seconds (faster than expected) > Ratio: 0.97 (not as expected) > Kernel 5.4-rc8, intel_cpufreq/performance: 2215.3 seconds > Kernel 5.4-rc8, intel_cpufreq/ondemand: 3286.3 seconds > Re-stated from previous e-mail: > Kernel 5.3-rc8, intel_cpufreq/schedutil: ratio: 0.69 (I don't have the original times) Hello Doug, schedutil in 5.4 going a lot faster than in 5.3 would be a surprise. I'm running that same test too to check if I can see it as well. Besides, as it's already been said this patchset adds frequency scale-invariance to scheduler metrics such as load and utilization and that's useful also in areas other than frequency scaling (most notably the scheduler load balancer). Thanks, Giovanni