Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932441AbWARBMT (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:12:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932442AbWARBMT (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:12:19 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:53132 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932441AbWARBMT (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:12:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:12:00 -0800 From: Greg KH To: akpm@osdl.org, Jeff Dike , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] uml: avoid sysfs warning on hot-unplug Message-ID: <20060118011200.GA28086@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1187 Lines: 32 > From: Jeff Dike , Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso > > Define a release method for the ubd and network driver so that sysfs doesn't > complain when one is removed via: What? No. The kernel is complaining for a reason, don't try to out-smart it. > > host $ uml_mconsole remove > > Done by Jeff around January for ubd only, later lost, then restored in his tree > - however I'm merging it now since there's no reason to leave this here. > > We don't need to do any cleanup in the new added method, because when hot-unplug > is done by uml_mconsole we already handle cleanup in mconsole infrastructure, > i.e. mc_device->remove (net_remove/ubd_remove), which is also the calling > method. Huh? You have 2 different release functions for the same object? And how do you know which one is correct? That does not sound right at all. Please fix this correctly. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/