Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a7ac93e3-9a1f-2cd5-bf0b-30b562bd707d@gmail.com> <20191126233735.GA215993@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <20191126233735.GA215993@google.com>
From:   Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Nov 2019 18:06:19 -0600
Message-ID: <CAL5oW01E=fE6=Z75THsBGd4XA67im5ivdzczAwmgCO1CaPzVng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: pciehp: Make sure pciehp_isr clears interrupt events
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc:     Austin Bolen <austin_bolen@dell.com>,
        Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
        Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
        Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>,
        Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 5:37 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 03:03:23PM -0600, Stuart Hayes wrote:
> >
> > On 11/12/19 3:59 PM, Stuart Hayes wrote:
> > > The pciehp interrupt handler pciehp_isr() will read the slot status
> > > register and then write back to it to clear just the bits that caused the
> > > interrupt. If a different interrupt event bit gets set between the read and
> > > the write, pciehp_isr() will exit without having cleared all of the
> > > interrupt event bits, so we will never get another hotplug interrupt from
> > > that device.
> > >
> > > That is expected behavior according to the PCI Express spec (v.5.0, section
> > > 6.7.3.4, "Software Notification of Hot-Plug Events").
> > >
> > > Because the "presence detect changed" and "data link layer state changed"
> > > event bits are both getting set at nearly the same time when a device is
> > > added or removed, this is more likely to happen than it might seem. The
> > > issue can be reproduced rather easily by connecting and disconnecting an
> > > NVMe device on at least one system model.
> > >
> > > This patch fixes the issue by modifying pciehp_isr() to loop back and
> > > re-read the slot status register immediately after writing to it, until
> > > it sees that all of the event status bits have been cleared.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>
> >
> > Bjorn,
> >
> > Do you have any comments or issues with this patch set?  Anything I can do?
>
> Were you planning to address Lukas' comments?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191114025022.wz3gchr7w67fjtzn@wunner.de

Yes, I submitted a V2 for this patch (https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/11/20/1147).

But--I'm very sorry, I didn't mean to ask if you had any comments on
this patch--I meant to ask about an earlier patch set, and
accidentally replied to the wrong thread.

I meant to ask you about this patch set:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191025190047.38130-1-stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com/

Thank you!  --Stuart