Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030213AbWARLAa (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:00:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030217AbWARLAa (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:00:30 -0500 Received: from grex.cyberspace.org ([216.86.77.194]:40453 "EHLO grex.cyberspace.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030213AbWARLA3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:00:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:00:22 -0500 From: Roopesh To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Synchronization between VFS and special IO requests to a block device. Message-ID: <20060118110022.GA32663@grex.cyberspace.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 949 Lines: 24 Hi, I have an SD card, a partition of which is mounted and is accessed only through VFS, and certain sectors out of this partition having some special data which is accessed by the applications only through certain ioctls to the device. My problem is in synchronizing/serializing these two accesses to the hardware, especially since I dont want a VFS request to be handled by the driver inbetween two specific ioctls. I understand that the strategy routine should be atomic and that it cant wait on a lock or sleep. Any pointers/suggestions/help? Mine is a 2.4 kernel with a uni-processor. Thanks in Advance, Roopesh. PS: Kindly mark a CC: to me if posting. Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/